Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Best Radar Detector Reviews > Radar Roy
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


Radar Roy Radar Roy is recognized as one the leading authorities in the radar detector industry. A former police officer, himself, Roy recently sold his company (RadarBusters) to a large catalog company (NetShops) but even in retirement, Roy continues to be a recognized force in this industry.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)   IP: 71.225.116.94
Old 2008-10-01
Veil Guy's Avatar
Veil Guy Veil Guy is offline
Speed Trap Hunter
 
Join Date: 2007 Jul
Posts: 116
Veil Guy is on a distinguished road
Default

SU,

Did you have your lights protected with Veil or did you only use the LS with the mimics?

VG


Veil Guy's Sig:

Protect yourself from speeding tickets[/b] with the VEIL stealth coating.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)   IP: 129.22.226.41
Old 2008-10-02
TSi+WRX TSi+WRX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Sep
Location: Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
Posts: 44
TSi+WRX is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veil Guy View Post
To be honest with you, despite the concerns expressed by some about the ZR4's "performance" relative to other jammers, it is its performance in the real-world against the average officer targeting.

I have had terrific real-world results with my 9500ci coupled with Veil G4 on my difficult to cloak metallic silver large sedan and have more than adequate protection.
Evaluated in that manner - against "typical" real-world enforcement scenarios - even the old ZR3 provided me with more than sufficient protection over the course of the preceding (with the exception of the last two years or so, where I've switched to other primary jammers) 3 years.

Truly and honestly, unless the jammer user's local area utilizes enforcement hardware that's completely unfavorable to the jammer being used and/or there exists truly unfavorable enforcement practices (i.e. extreme close-range, etc.), just about any of today's jammers, be it LED-based or laser-diode based, will suffice.

And to quantify these statements, I think it's also important to add that this assumes one is not "hyperspeeding," as well as that these statements apply only to North-American enforcement scenarios.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectre_User View Post
So the new G4 is good on HID lights???
As factory HID lighting systems effectively have "light to spare," the impact on lighting output that G4 exacts (which is drastically *less* than that of G2) will be further mitigated. To demonstrate, take my vehicle/setup as an example: my standard halogen-incandescent low-beams utilize a 65 watt solution for a 55 watt factory setup, and with a single coat of G4, the resultant brightness of my setup falls somewhere between my overwattage solution, and the factory. With my high beams, which are an HIR1 setup, there's really no perceivable effect of the G4, whatsoever.

Similarly, typically, the advanced optics of such HID systems also mean sharper cut-offs and more precise beam-patterns. This, although it will still be somewhat negatively affected by G4, is also mitigated by the fact that such patterns are already so exacting, and the slight "blurring" will not be noticeable to anyone but "automotive lighting enthusiasts." Yep, just as there exist dorks and nerds who love speed detection countermeasures , there also exist those among us who are similarly devoted to vehicle lighting advances and modifications.

There's a hobby for everyone!


TSi+WRX's Sig:- Allen/Usual Suspect "DumboRAT"/One of the Three Stooges

LI Rev.2.8, Ver.7.03 - quad 8.0A-f w/ 8.5 Slim-r
LPP v8.3h(CAN/AU)/10.1s, 2xF/1xR
9500i, Red (4307) w/ZR3
VEIL G4
CR8APL8s, w/LaserShield(F)
Cheetah GPS-Mirror

[ Wifey's FXT -> Bue 8500x50 (Rev.5); LI Rev.2.9, Ver.7.08 - dual 8.5 ]

Me: '05 Legacy 2.5GT Ltd., mildly modified
Wifey: '09 Forester XT, barely modded
Baby-Anna: too short to reach any pedals!

Last edited by TSi+WRX; 2008-10-02 at 09:10.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)   IP: 71.225.116.94
Old 2008-10-02
Veil Guy's Avatar
Veil Guy Veil Guy is offline
Speed Trap Hunter
 
Join Date: 2007 Jul
Posts: 116
Veil Guy is on a distinguished road
Default

TSi+WRX,

You speak the truth and I really appreciate your input on these matters.

Personally, the only evaluation that ultimately means anything to me is what happens in the real-world (ie; will one avoid speeding tickets), that's why I have supported this forum or test radar detectors and other countermeasures in the format that I do (ie; countermeasure vs. traffic enforcement).

The truth about controlled tests is the testers attempt to defeat the countermeasure to discover and highlight the relative strengths and/or weaknesses of each countermeasure tested.

Officers operating police lidar are merely trying to obtain a speed reading without the expectation of being interfered with. For instance, tripod usage (at least today) is a thing of history (especially with the newer GEN III/IV lidar guns being designed in the manner they are--lighter and much easier to hand-hold than their Gen I or II counterparts). While tripod mounting does go a long way to eliminate targeting variance, which is essential for back to comparisons while maximizing the chances of creating a controlled-test element.

The nature of this kind of targeting is not real-world.

When Steve and I were speed trap hunting recently in Ohio in my silver sedan that only had Veil G4 and the 9500ci, we got one JTG against an LTI Ultralyte and another one with about a 300 foot punchthrough (estimated). When I got tagged twice in the rear in norther Kentucky and I did not receive a speeding ticket, I knew that my rear ZR4 head in combination with Veil on the taillights saved my butt, big time.

In all of these cases, I had plenty of time to safely adjust my speed downward without concern. To me these are the ultimate tests to measure the ultimate utility of these countermeasures

I believe StealthJamal has thoroughly enjoyed the long and reliable service of his Passport ZR3 alone (as he has chosen specifically not to use Veil with his jammer setup). His vehicle was metallic silver, too.

To be clear, I am not denigrating any other countermeasure manufacturer or product. I am merely stating that in the real-world the majority of these products will provide adequate protection and get the job done.

It really turns me off to see a company, their reps, their customers, or amoral shills attempt to prop up (ie; hype) their products by attacking or displaying the weaknesses (whether real, imagined, or fabricated) of another company's products.

This was at the heart of my displeasure of the tone and negativism that pervaded another online forum (one that I was an early supporter of) which subsequently led to my forfeiture of my long-held administrative role and reduced long-term participation. (BTW, I am pleased to see things have improved [there] since those dark days).

In this instance the forum owner was more interested in having controversy (which he believed drove traffic to his site) than hosting elevated and enlightened mature discussion and debate.

If was for this reason primarily that I set out to create a forum where such rancor was not encouraged and participants are free to express their genuine beliefs without fear of being "thrown under the bus." That's the vision that I had for this forum: to educate and illuminate not to persuade and manipulate.

Veil Guy


Veil Guy's Sig:

Protect yourself from speeding tickets[/b] with the VEIL stealth coating.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)   IP: 151.213.147.252
Old 2008-10-02
steagall1000 steagall1000 is offline
Banned Indefinitely
 
Join Date: 2007 Jul
Location: Homer, Georgia
Posts: 30
steagall1000 is on a distinguished road
Default Same thought

Veil Guy,

I think the ZR4 is a good performer, and I agree with normal police targeting these days, the ZR4 is probably enough protection against even the worse case senario. Your right about one thing, and that is along as you have enough time to slow down, then thats all that matters. I have been through so many laser traps and sweated each one I ran into. You never know if the officer is trying to shoot center mass, or if he's trying to be creative and clip your side mirrors. One officer told me he shoots at the windshields because of their reflective surfaces. Hell I hope I never run into that officer at 500 feet. The thing I have learned the most about lidar targeting and jammers is, you can still get toasted. Every jammer has its weak spots. Like for example my lower bumper. My heads are too far away to cover the lower corner of my honda bumper. So if a officer targeted just right within 500 feet, I'm toast. I guess the real answer to this is are laser jammers effective in giving you enough time to slow down?? Yes but it depends on different factors and senarios. Can you still get a speeding ticket with a laser jammer?? Absolutely, depending on your setup and if the unit is not installed properly, or it doesn't perform well. So in my opinion jammers are only 70-90% effective. There is no 100% protection from laser. Atleast not yet!







Quote:
Originally Posted by Veil Guy View Post
To be honest with you, despite the concerns expressed by some about the ZR4's "performance" relative to other jammers, it is its performance in the real-world against the average officer targeting.

I have had terrific real-world results with my 9500ci coupled with Veil G4 on my difficult to cloak metallic silver large sedan and have more than adequate protection.

I have even had some rear targeting in Kentucky that provided real-world protection (and I am sure I would have been toast without it).

I am personally not measuring my satisfaction with my particular laser jammer by its percentage of JTG (or lack thereof) and I have yet to encounter a real-world laser encounter where I did not have the protection I needed. Until such time otherwise, that's good enough for me.

This in no way takes away my support for these other jammmers and the enthusiasms shared by users of them.

It's all good.

Veil Guy

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)   IP: 76.190.193.28
Old 2008-10-03
TSi+WRX TSi+WRX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Sep
Location: Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
Posts: 44
TSi+WRX is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veil Guy View Post
You speak the truth and I really appreciate your input on these matters.
No need to thank me - I'm just glad another Forum/community has been started, to help our fellow motorists and hobbyists. Another great resource.

Quote:
Personally, the only evaluation that ultimately means anything to me is what happens in the real-world (ie; will one avoid speeding tickets), that's why I have supported this forum or test radar detectors and other countermeasures in the format that I do (ie; countermeasure vs. traffic enforcement).

The truth about controlled tests is the testers attempt to defeat the countermeasure to discover and highlight the relative strengths and/or weaknesses of each countermeasure tested.

Officers operating police lidar are merely trying to obtain a speed reading without the expectation of being interfered with. For instance, tripod usage (at least today) is a thing of history (especially with the newer GEN III/IV lidar guns being designed in the manner they are--lighter and much easier to hand-hold than their Gen I or II counterparts). While tripod mounting does go a long way to eliminate targeting variance, which is essential for back to comparisons while maximizing the chances of creating a controlled-test element.

The nature of this kind of targeting is not real-world.

When Steve and I were speed trap hunting recently in Ohio in my silver sedan that only had Veil G4 and the 9500ci, we got one JTG against an LTI Ultralyte and another one with about a 300 foot punchthrough (estimated). When I got tagged twice in the rear in norther Kentucky and I did not receive a speeding ticket, I knew that my rear ZR4 head in combination with Veil on the taillights saved my butt, big time.

In all of these cases, I had plenty of time to safely adjust my speed downward without concern. To me these are the ultimate tests to measure the ultimate utility of these countermeasures

I believe StealthJamal has thoroughly enjoyed the long and reliable service of his Passport ZR3 alone (as he has chosen specifically not to use Veil with his jammer setup). His vehicle was metallic silver, too.

To be clear, I am not denigrating any other countermeasure manufacturer or product. I am merely stating that in the real-world the majority of these products will provide adequate protection and get the job done.
I agree.

I think that what matters to the majority of people in this hobby, as well as likely the vast majority of motorists and other interested individuals who come to our community (both here and elsewhere) to obtain ideas and seek advice, is "ticket saving" performance.

In this respect, I think that currently, the enthusiast community is a bit too hung-up on "JTG."

Certainly, I well know that in some areas of the US, "true-JTG" performance is not only nice to have, it's actually necessary. I know because I live in an area where I've seen engagements from as low as 300 ft.

Similarly, in some areas, JFG performance is required as well, due to rear-enforcement concerns.

But in the vast majority of the country, enforcement hardware is not "the latest and greatest," and enforcement practices do not require such extremes of protection, and "good enough" is just that, good enough - and will more than guaranty a ticket-free and worry-free driving experience (provided that one's not "hyperspeeding," and, of course, in speaking only of LIDAR).

The rigors of controlled-situation testing is, precisely as you cited, to expose select and specific weakness under nothing less than "worst case" circumstances. The true likelihood of running into such a probing by roadside enforcement is virtually nil.

Yet, the argument that this "once in a blue moon" kind of circumstance is what some are looking to invest against - as well as is exemplified by their local enforcement practices - does remain a valid justification for seeking "the next higher level" of performance.

Quote:
It really turns me off to see a company, their reps, their customers, or amoral shills attempt to prop up (ie; hype) their products by attacking or displaying the weaknesses (whether real, imagined, or fabricated) of another company's products.
Agreed, and I think I am also among the majority in the community who think that it is not necessary for any company or their representatives to "speak for" or "push" their product, at all.

Instead, from the numerous individual hobbyist testers as well as hobbyist testing groups now formed throughout the community, I truly believe that all that a product has to do to "sell" is to simply demonstrate to the buying public, in the hands of the end-customers, that it performs as one would expect based on its price and advertising claims.

A good product really will, it's now proven in the community, literally sell itself.

Quote:
This was at the heart of my displeasure of the tone and negativism that pervaded another online forum (one that I was an early supporter of) which subsequently led to my forfeiture of my long-held administrative role and reduced long-term participation. (BTW, I am pleased to see things have improved [there] since those dark days).

In this instance the forum owner was more interested in having controversy (which he believed drove traffic to his site) than hosting elevated and enlightened mature discussion and debate.
I think that a part of the problem is certainly driven by the vested financial concerns of individuals.

The other part of the problem, I think, is that what exacerbates that condition/concern is the presence of people who are less than morally/ethically "solid," and are more easily swayed by the prospect of personal gain.

Add to this brew the even more unfortunate fact that many of said individuals are also the ones who like to shout the loudest....well, we all saw what became of some rather unfortuante situations, on RD.net.

And undoubtedly, the fact that it is the most well-known and most popular of the online hobbyist Forums certainly serves to not only attract those who are genuinely interested in learning or genuinely interested in helping, but also those who have ulterior motives in mind.

Quote:
If was for this reason primarily that I set out to create a forum where such rancor was not encouraged and participants are free to express their genuine beliefs without fear of being "thrown under the bus." That's the vision that I had for this forum: to educate and illuminate not to persuade and manipulate.
Good stuff.

-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by steagall1000 View Post
The thing I have learned the most about lidar targeting and jammers is, you can still get toasted. Every jammer has its weak spots. Like for example my lower bumper. My heads are too far away to cover the lower corner of my honda bumper. So if a officer targeted just right within 500 feet, I'm toast.
I honestly don't think that this is a fault of the jammer - inherent - per-se.

Rather, I think that it is more a fault of setup.

Certainly, it can be said that a jammer that doesn't have sufficient capability to fully "cover" the front of X or Y vehicle - when compared to another that can - carries with it an inherent fault, but in all honesty, I simply think that this is more along the lines of the concern being a "technical limitation."

You cite, steagall, that your setup is incapable of protection the lower corners of your front bumper. Is this with the M25 two-head setup, M35 three-head, or M45 four-head?

I'd be willing to bet that this is either a limitation of the two head setup (more likely) or the three-head (less likely) - and that if you were to bump up to the four-head setup, you'd virtually fully eliminate this concern (at least versus *most* LIDAR devices).

And although I doubt that the following is your case, it has been demonstrated - with not only the Blinder, but also the ZR3/4, the LPP, and even the LI - that failure of proper head placement, as well as maintenance of leveling/aim/cleaning can also cause such concerns. In such a scenario, I believe that the fault is with the end-user, not of the device itself.

Quote:
I guess the real answer to this is are laser jammers effective in giving you enough time to slow down?? Yes but it depends on different factors and senarios. Can you still get a speeding ticket with a laser jammer?? Absolutely, depending on your setup and if the unit is not installed properly, or it doesn't perform well. So in my opinion jammers are only 70-90% effective. There is no 100% protection from laser. Atleast not yet!
The factors and scenarios, in my opinion, does not only cover "our" end of the equation:

- the car's finish, size, profile, and specific hardpoint configuration
- the utilization of proper/sufficient active and/or passive countermeasures
- the proper placement/setup and maintenance of such countermeasures
- failure to engage/activate the device
- proper function of the jammer (i.e. malfunction)

and the other side:

- the enforcement hardware
- the enforcement setup
- the enforcer's skill

but also terrain/secondary variables:

- over the hill/crest with a setup that's not suited for such
- from-overpass with a setup that's not suited to such
- rear-on from-elevation

- vehicle traversing roadway irregularity, with already compromised aim/leveling/setup

[ Note: of these "terrain" variables, there have been video demonstrations from various groups' testing, as well as first-hand tales, logged for reference on various hobbyist Forums, from various jammer users who've received tickets from unexpected/early PT/burnthrough from such issues. ]

and also, there's the intangible:

- aka: just blind bad luck for us, and good luck for the enforcer, for WHATEVER reason.



To me, it's much more than just the jammer being effective, on a technical level.

There's many layers to the equation, and failure of ANY of these will readily shift the balance of favor to the other side.

This is why I always say that the odds are not with us. The odds always favor "The House."


TSi+WRX's Sig:- Allen/Usual Suspect "DumboRAT"/One of the Three Stooges

LI Rev.2.8, Ver.7.03 - quad 8.0A-f w/ 8.5 Slim-r
LPP v8.3h(CAN/AU)/10.1s, 2xF/1xR
9500i, Red (4307) w/ZR3
VEIL G4
CR8APL8s, w/LaserShield(F)
Cheetah GPS-Mirror

[ Wifey's FXT -> Bue 8500x50 (Rev.5); LI Rev.2.9, Ver.7.08 - dual 8.5 ]

Me: '05 Legacy 2.5GT Ltd., mildly modified
Wifey: '09 Forester XT, barely modded
Baby-Anna: too short to reach any pedals!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Visit to Escort: Discussing the Escort Passport 9500ci Speed Trap Hunter Escort (Passport) 17 2012-06-06 20:31
New Escort Passport 9500ix Veil Guy Escort (Passport) 32 2011-05-16 00:58
Red Light Camera and Speed Camera CrimeLine NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-07 22:11
The Effect Of Speed Limits On Actual Travel Speeds NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-08-24 22:19
ACLU on Photo Enforcement, Red Light Cameras, Speed Cameras, Surveillance Cameras Veil Guy Speed on Green - Photo Enforcement 0 2008-02-01 23:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:01.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter