Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > National Motorists Association (NMA) Discussion Group & Forum > NMA Articles
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


NMA Articles National Motorists Association (NMA) Articles

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2016-08-19
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation 2016 VW Golf R Review

NMA Article: 2016 VW Golf R Review

Hereís an irony for you:


When VW launched the hot hatch Golf R last year, it came only with an automatic transmission. This year, Ford has launched the even hotter hatch Focus RS — which comes only with a manual transmission.


Ships passing in the nightÖ


Now VW has decided to make a manual transmission standard equipment in the Golf R — and lowered the MSRP vs. last year (and vs. the new Focus RS).


Probably, this was necessary to counter the Fordís apparent performance advantage.


Italics for a reason.


Though the feisty Ford has more engine — 2.3 liters and 350 hp vs. the VWís 2.0 liters and 292 hp — as it turns out, the VW is still the quicker ride.


If you buy it with the automatic transmission!


Alannis Morissette, phone home.


WHAT IT IS


The Golf R is VWís take on the ďrally carĒ concept pioneered by the Subaru WRX STi and Mitsubishi Lancer EVO (RIP). Take a compact economy-car sedan/hatchback as your starting point. Chuck the economy car engine and replace it with a high-powered turbo engine; mate this to an all-wheel-drive system set up for maximum cornering grip. Lower it. Fit it with the most aggressive DOT street legal tires you can find.


And hope the insurance mafia doesnít notice.


The R is a smarter ride in this respect than the Subaru WRX STi or the recently retired Mitsu EVO — both of which were not so subtle. It has no wings, no gold-anodized wheels.


Such things may make a car look fast. I’d rather get away with going fast.


Itís also a more sophisticated ride.


Literally.


It rides like a car that has some pretensions to everyday driver status. The STi and EVO are (and were, in the case of the Mitsu) big fun for the first 30 minutes or so. Until your back began to ache — and the drone from the road/tire noise began to drive you nuts.


The Golf R will run with either of them, when youíre running all out. But it will also run all day without wearing you out.


Base price is $35,650 for the newly available manual-equipped base trim. If you prefer the automated manual (DSG) transmission, the sticker rises to $36,750.


A top-of-the line model with an adjustable suspension (DCC) lists for $37,895 with the manual six-speed and $38,995 with the DSG six-speed automatic.


The Rís main rivals are the Subaru WRX STI (base price $35,663) and the Ford Focus RS (base price $36,605).


The Subaru is a sedan-only deal, however and — like the Ford — itís currently only available with a manual transmission.


WHATíS GOOD


Itís not blatant. Other than the lowered ride and super-low-profile tires, it looks — at a glance — like just another Golf. Which is what you want if you want to use this thing for its intended purpose.


Go manual (for fun and lower MSRP) or automatic (for quicker ET and less work in traffic).


Would you believe it gets not-bad gas mileage (vs. the WRX STiís horrendous mileage)?


Practical hatchback layout (STi is sedan-only).


Roomier back seats (and more room for cargo) than Focus RS.


Feels like itís worth $35k.


WHATíS NOT SO GOOD


Golf GTI also feels nice — and it starts out $10k less.


Some in-car electronic ďsafetyĒ systems radiate radar clutter — interfering with your radar detector. See video below.


UNDER THE HOOD


Engines may be getting smaller (to please Uncle) but the power being squeezed out of them isnít. The Rís comparatively tiny 2.0 liter four makes 292 hp (and 280 ft.-lbs. of torque at just 1,800 RPM). To appreciate how much power that is per liter of displacement, reflect that if this 2.0 four were a 6.0 liter V8, that V8 would be making 876 hp.


Which is why the 3,283 lb. R is capable of doing the 0-60 run in just 4.5 seconds — making it exactly as quick as the Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack I tested a few weeks ago (see here). And the Dodge needed 6.4 liters of V8 (just 485 hp out of all those liters) to git Ďer done.


Once catch, though.


The R is capable of getting you to 60 in the mid-fours …when itís ordered with the automated manual (DSG) transmission.


The manual version is about 3/4 of a second less quick, needing 5.3 seconds to reach 60.


Why the disparity? The DSG has the edge in terms of quickness of shifts — as well as perfection of shift timing. It can do the 1-2 (and 3-4 and 4-5-6) with the syncopation of a computer-controlled maestro. This, incidentally, is why the DSG-equipped R is quicker than the Focus RS (4.7 seconds to 60) despite the Fordí s very impressive 350 hp (out of 2.3 liters) horsepower.


Because you canít shift the Fordís manual six-speed as quickly as the VW DSG shifts itself.


Same goes for the manual-equipped Subaru WRX STi. It has 305 hp — but needs 5 seconds to get to 60.


Itís also a sloppy sister, gas mileage-wise.


The Subaru gets about 17 in the city, 23 on the highway. Youíll be checking for holes in the gas tank. Same with the Ford: 19 city, 25 highway.


That V8 Charger R/T mentioned a minute ago? It rates 15 city, 25 highway. And it weighs about 1,000 pounds more and has literally three times the engine (size-wise).


The VW, on the other hand, conjures as much as 22 city and 31 on the highway with the manual six-speed; 23 city/30 on the highway with the automated manual.


That’s a big difference.


Premium fuel is recommended — but not required (same goes for the Focus RS, a chit in its favor).

The unfortunate STi requires it.


ON THE ROAD


ďCivilizedĒ is probably not the word youíd expect to read in a sentence about a car capable of a sub-five-second 0-60 run.


But the R is.


No popping wastegate drama or tire chirping shifts marks your progress as the car builds speed.


Youíre just suddenly Ö there.


The DSG box will get you there quicker, but the manual is much more fun. Particularly because VW has programmed the engine to rev beyond the advertised redline (just over 6,000 RPM) to almost 7,000 RPM — which is the real redline. At which point a ďsoft touchĒ rev limiter cuts in and thatís your cue to clutch in and move up to the next gear.


But it all happens without much in the way of fireworks. The exhaust gets boomier (exiting through four tips rather than two as in the GTI) in the upper RPM ranges, but itís well within civilized range. Just enough to let you know youíre packing something; not so much that it annoys the neighbors every time you leave the driveway.


The same dynamic holds true for the ride. Itís civilized. Even with the optional 19-inch wheels and ultra low-profile summer tires (which are bundled with the DCC adaptive suspension) you do not know — in the biblical sense — the contours of every pothole.


In the STi, you do.


Itís fun, a great track day car — but harder to live with as a daily driver/road trip ride. In addition to the engine noise and the washboard abs ride, there is a fair amount of wind/tire/road noise in the STi, too.


I havenít yet driven the Focus RS — but it has a high standard to measure up to.


There is also this business of the automatic.


Itís availability in the VW and its unavailability in its two principal rivals. If you are looking at any of these three as a possible primary — the car you will be driving to work and back every day — the availability of an automatic in the VW may be persuasive. Much as manuals are fun when the road is wide open, they are less so when the road is packed with other cars.


Also, check out the legs.


The VW can travel 450 miles on a tankful (14.5 gallons) while the Subaru runs dry after 365 miles (notwithstanding its larger 15.9 gallon tank).


Thatís almost 100 milesí difference in range between the two.


AT THE CURB


The R is visually quiet. Not even a hood scoop is there to give the game away.


It looks pretty much like a Golf. A four-door Golf.


This is perfect.


Never advertise your intentions. You want to do — not look like you do.


Right?


The Boy Racer crowd will not appreciate this, of course. Itís why they are Boy Racers. A few years of SR-22 insurance will cure them.


Nothing against either the STi or the Focus RSÖ provided they are driven to the trackÖ at legal speeds. Otherwise, you probably wonít be driving either (legally) on the street for very long. These are just the realities.


And the Rís virtues.


Speaking of which. The R is a hatchback. The STi — for reasons known only to Subaru — is currently sold only as a sedan. Which means it has a trunk rather than a cargo area.


A small trunk.


Just 12 cubic feet vs. 22.8 cubic feet behind the second row in the VW (nearly twice as much space) and 52.7 cubic feet with the second row folded (more than four times the space). The Focus RS — being a hatchback like the VW — also has Space, just a bit less (18.9 cubic feet behind its second row; 44.8 cubic feet with the second row down).


It also has a somewhat cramped back seat — 33.2 inches of legroom and 37.9 inches of headroom vs. 35.6 inches of legroom and 38.1 inches of headroom in the R.


The Subaru has good back seat legroom (35.4 inches) but headroom is tightest of the bunch (37.1 inches). But specs donít convey the VWís higher-rent ambiance. It is, after all, a VW — and a VW is almost an AudiÖ and an Audi is a luxury-brand car. No offense to either the STi or the Focus but both are based on Subarus and Fords … economy car versions of those Subarus and Fords. The R starts out with a nicer platform and has nicer materials (such as the real chromed metal trim pieces rather than plastic, the woven carbon fiber mesh on the shifter handle and leather that looks — and feels — like it came from a higher class of cow).


The only nit — if it is one — is that you can get the same interior (pretty much) in the much less pricey GTI (which starts around $24k).


Including the 200 MPH speedo.


But the R might actually be able to peg it.


The GTI not so much.


THE REST


The weird little VW-specific pigtail for hooking up your iPod is nixed; there are now normal USB ports (and an SD card reader, too).


All trims get an updated LCD touchscreen, but itís still a little small (6.5 inches) vs. some of the stuff available in other cars and thereís no optional upgrade.


The optional Fender audio rig is, however, top drawer.


My One Big Gripe with this car is that some of its systems — Iím not certain which — leak a lot of radar signal. Which gave my radar detector conniption fits. Constant false flag alerts. This of course impairs the usefulness of the radar detector — which impairs the ability to use the R. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Wgo1_lss4k


The R they sent me had the optional Driver Assistance package, which bundles adaptive cruise control with an automated braking/collision avoidance system and lane departure warning. I suspect itís one or several of these ďsafetyĒ systems that radiate the always-on radar signal (because some or all of these systems canít be totally turned off).


My bet is the R without the Driver Assistance package would be more radar detector friendly.


THE BOTTOM LINE


Itís very fast — but doesn’t look very furious.


Just the ticket… for avoiding tickets.


Comments?


www.ericpetersautos.com


The post 2016 VW Golf R Review appeared first on National Motorists Association.





© 2009 NMA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2016 Buick Cascada Review NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2016-08-19 05:05
2016 Chevy Cruze Review NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2016-08-19 05:05
2016 Mini Cooper Convertible Review NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2016-08-19 05:05
2016 Lexus NX200t Review NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2016-08-19 05:05
2016 Nissan Titan XD Review NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2016-08-19 05:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:06.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter