Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > National Motorists Association (NMA) Discussion Group & Forum > NMA Articles
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


NMA Articles National Motorists Association (NMA) Articles

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2016-08-19
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation 2016 Lexus NX200t Review

NMA Article: 2016 Lexus NX200t Review

The original Lexus RX was an automotive rogue wave when it appeared way back in 1998. At that time, there was nothing else like it: A luxury crossover SUV. Not a pick-up truck converted into an SUV.


Today, everyone — almost literally — sells something like the RX.


Even Porsche.


So, selling the RX today is not as slam-dunk easy a sell as it was back in í98.


Which is why Lexus (and everyone else) also sells different takes on the same idea.


Like the NX.



It is a smaller-scale RX, basically.


For the prospect who wants something similar, a bit sportier perhaps — but not as big. And not as expensive.


WHAT IT IS


The NX is a compact-sized luxury crossover SUV — basically a scaled-down RX.


Like the RX, itís available in front-wheel-drive and all-wheel versions as well as an F Sport version, which gets the usual suspension and wheel/tire upgrades as well as more aggressive-looking bodywork and trim.


There is also a hybrid version — the NX300 (reviewed separately, here).


But itís about a foot shorter overall and — unlike the RX — the NX comes only with a four cylinder engine (turbocharged and intercooled as well as a bunch of other things) while the RX comes only with a V6 (not turbocharged).


Itís also more affordable: $34,965 to start for the base trim with FWD ($36,365 for the same trim with AWD) vs. $41,900 for the base FWD RX350.


A top-of-the-line NX200 with the F Sport package and AWD stickers for $38,465 — vs. $49,125 for the F Sport/AWD version of the RX350.


Cross-shops include other compact-sized luxury crossovers like the Audi Q5 ($40,900 to start) and the Acura RDX ($35,370 to start) and the new (just launched) Mercedes GLC 300, which replaces the GLK 350 in Mercedesí lineup. It is priced at $38,950 to start.


The Audi is more expensive, but comes standard with AWD. The Acura costs about the same — but comes standard with a big V6 (getting very rare in this segment and generally).


The Benz, meanwhile, is the only model in this class thatís based on a rear-wheel-drive layout (with AWD available optionally) and can out-tow (and out-run) them all.


WHATíS NEW


The NX was brought out last year as an all-new model for Lexus. The 2016 is pretty much identical except for a slight price uptick and an update of the Enform smartphone integration system. You can use the app to get maintenance alerts and other info about your NX piped directly to your phone.


WHATíS GOOD


Get a bit less RX forÖ less.


More space in the garage.


Lots of Tech.


Newer than aging Q5 and RDX (both last redesigned about four years ago).


WHATíS NOT SO GOOD


Not as quick as rivals.


Engine requires premium fuel.


Less space for cargo (and passengers) than RX… and same-sized rivals.


Lots of Tech.


UNDER THE HOOD


The NX — and the new Benz GLC — are four cylinder-only deals.


You can still get a six in the Audi Q5 (optionally) and the Acura RDX (standard) but they are older models that were designed before the Crunch of the serious pressure to increase MPGs by any means necessary — the main approach being via reducing the number of cylinders under the hood. Expect the next-generation Q5 and RDX to lose their sixes and become four cylinder-only rides as well.


The NXís four is 2.0 liters — a size of four thatís becoming very common regardless of make/model in part because of European regulations that impose fines and other costs on engines larger than 2 liters. But also because of pressure (applied by Uncle) to use less fuel…. no matter what it costs us.


The four in the Lexus makes 235 hp and 258 ft.-lbs. of torque, peaking at 1,650 RPM (instead of much higher up the RPM scale, as was formerly usual) due to the miracle of twin-scroll turbocharging, which gets the boost up almost immediately and without lag.


This engine, which is Lexus’ first turbocharged engine, is also a high-compression (10.0:1) engine, unusual because it is turbocharged and usually, the compression is lower when the engine is turbocharged because the turbo is itself a compression increaser. But modern engine management (anti-knock sensors) and aluminum for the block and heads (dissipates heat better than cast iron) and a mix of both direct and port fuel injection makes it feasible to run a high CR and as much as 17 pounds of boost — without the engine grenading itself.


But it does require premium fuel — which has the higher octane (and slower burn rate) a heavily boosted engine usually must deliver to the touted fuel economy and performance.


A six-speed automatic is the only transmission available, but you have your choice of FWD (standard) or AWD (optional).


Either way, the NX200 gets to 60 in 7 seconds flat.


Gas mileage with FWD is 22 city, 28 highway; with AWD itís almost exactly the same (21 city, 28 highway).


These are good numbers. However, several rivals post slightly better numbers.


The new Benz GLC, the Acura RDX and the Audi Q5 are all noticeably quicker (6.2 seconds to 60, 6.5 seconds to 60 and 6.6 seconds to 60, respectively). The Audi can also be ordered with a stronger (272 hp) V6 that reduces its 0-60 time to 5.7 seconds.


All give you about the same fuel economy, too — including the V6-powered Acura (20 city, 28 highway with FWD; 19 city, 27 highway with AWD) notwithstanding almost twice the displacement and two more cylinders — and without the added plumbing and potential down-the-road (and post-warranty) expense of a turbo and intercooler.


The Acuraís V6 is also ok with regular unleaded. Premium is recommended — but isnít required.


The NX can tow up to 2,000 lbs. — enough to handle a small trailer.


The Audi Q5 used to be able to pull more than twice that but — courtesy of Uncle — it is no longer available with the diesel engine that made that possible. Interestingly, the much-stronger (and V6 powered) Acura RDX is only rated to pull 1,500 lbs.


The Benz GLC — which is built on an inherently more rugged RWD-based chassis — can pull a class-best 5,300 lbs.


ON THE ROAD


Ordinarily — and not long ago — a 2.0 liter engine in a two-ton SUV (3,940 lbs. for the FWD version of the NX) would have been like taking two of a 747ís four engines off the wings and hoping for the best come take-off time.


Better have a long runway.


But the twin squeeze of high-compression and high boost produces the hp and torque of a much larger engine and — key thing — much sooner.


Note that the almost-twice-as-large Acura RDXís 3.5 liter V6 makes less torque, 252 ft.-lbs. vs. the NXís 258 ft.-lbs. — much later (4,900 RPM vs. 1,650 for the Lexusí four).


So even though the Acura will eventually outrun the Lexus at the end of a 0-60 sprint, the Lexus feels stronger initially — when the light turns green, coming off the line. It also has a strong-feeling mid-range, again courtesy of the lower torque peak.


And horsepower peak.


The NXís full 235 hp is made at 4,800 RPM while the Acuraís 279 hp doesnít arrive until a fairly high 6,200 RPM.


Which, incidentally, is several hundred RPM beyond the NX fourís redline.


These small — but heavily boosted — fours may be better suited to the job theyíre tasked with (pulling a heavy SUV) than larger (but not turbocharged) sixes that make good power and torque — but higher up, where itís less accessible. These aren’t sports cars, after all. And then consider the type of driving most people do most of the time. It is not high-speed driving. Itís stop-and-go driving. Short bursts and merges. Engines with strong low and mid-ranges are well-suited for this kind of duty.


The NX isnít the quickest in the class or even among the quickest but it is probably quick enough.


Benz has one-upped Lexus with its similarity force-fed 2.0 liter four — which makes 273 ft.-lbs. at an even lower 1,300 RPM.


But it probably wonít matter to people shopping the NX, which is a Lexus.


What matters to Lexus People is whether thereís enough power (and strong enough performance) ….and there is.


Lexus is successful because it knows its buyers — and doesnít try to sell them an Acura or a Benz or an Audi wearing the Lexus swoosh badge. This means a car — or a crossover — that is above all quiet and comfortable.


This is what RX buyers want — and theyíll find it in the NX, too.


Lexus actually had to pump artificial gnarly engine sounds — via the stereo — into the NX’s cabin because the cabin is so well insulated and the engine itself is too quiet. This is called Active Sound Control. ( I wonder whether the system could be adjusted to play the sounds of a Quadrajetís secondaries opening up?)


F Sports add a little spice to the mix, but not enough to make you reach for a glass of water. The main noticeable difference is sharpened up steering response from the 18-inch wheel and tire package that comes with this one (seventeens are standard otherwise) but the ride isnít harshened up. You also get a turbo boost gauge — which is the only way to tell there is a turbo in this thing without rooting around under the hood.


Throttle response, steering effort and the shift characteristics of the six-speed automatic can be tailored somewhat via a knob on the center console that lets the driver select Eco or Normal of Sport modes. None of these settings dramatically alter the personality of the NX, which is typical. Iíve never understood why (given the tunability of modern, computer-controlled drivetrains) they canít — or wonít — set it so that when Sport is dialed up, you get really aggressive — tire chirping — shifts, not just slightly more aggressive shiftsÖ and so on.


Itís fairly easy to get the tires to squeal but the TCS system is more than typically deft at keeping its interventions in the background. In some cars, youíll feel an abrupt application of the brakes and then a long second of no throttle response as the TCS works to regain the vehicleís equipoise. The NX doesnít do this even when pushed beyond the grip limits of the tires.


Or rather, it does it — but not so you feel it.


The seats are an NX high water mark, exceptionally supportive — or so they felt to me.


Your mileage may vary.


I also liked the feel of the grab-handle shift lever. Yes, itís drive-by-wire and so not physically connected to anything. But it feels like it is — as opposed to the Game Boy toggles that have become common in entry-luxury cars and generally that have no mechanical feel at all.


The NXís chief ďdrivingĒ deficit is the finger-swipe (and tap) input controller for the infotainment system. Thereís a track pad on the center console and it works just fine when youíre not moving. But when the car is moving, itís hard to keep your finger steady and sometimes youíll select GPS instead of Radio. Luckily, there are secondary methods of doing things. The LCD touchscreen being one and there are also knobs for the most essential functions, like adjusting radio volume and changing stations.


AT THE CURB


The NX is about a foot shorter, end to end, than the RX: 182.3 inches overall vs. 192.5 for the RX (just redesigned). It also sits about 3 inches lower (67.7 inches at the roofline for the RX vs. 64.8 for the NX).


So itís more compact and fits more easily into garages and curbside parking spots.


But it is also more cramped than rivals like the RDX, Q5 and Benz GLC — all of which have more rear seat legroom (37.3 inches, 37.4 inches and 37.3 inches, respectively) than the NX (36.1 inches). Cargo capacity behind the NXís second row is also not tremendous: 17.7 cubic feet vs. 29.1 for the Audi Q5, 26.1 for the Acura RDX and 20 cubic feet for the Benz GLC300.


But some ground is recovered when the NXís second row is folded flat, which opens up capacity to 54.6 cubes — which is competitive with the GLCís 56.5 cubes and the Audi Q5ís 57.3 cubes. The downside, of course, is that you have to choose passengers or cargo. The Audi and the Mercedes give you decent room for both.


The NX is more crossover-looking than the traditional SUV-looking GLC and Q5 — which still have the familiar ďthree boxĒ silhouette.


The NXís jutting forth chin is particular distinctive (Jay Leno ought to get royalties). Likewise, itís hard to miss the massive Lexus spindle grille — which looks proportionately bigger than it actually is because of the RC-F super car-inspired slit-eyed headlights. The side profile is hunkier than the RXís due to the pronounced fender flares and short (relative to the height of the door) side glass. Visibility is still good — to the sides. But the view behind you is crimped by the too-tall second row headrests, which Uncle has mandated for ďsafety.Ē


These canít be removed, unfortunately.


THE REST


The center console is gorgeous to look at but the storage cubby is too small and pushed too far back. Accessing the 12V power point and the USB ports — which are located inside the cubby — is awkward.


On the other hand, the console has a wireless charging tray for your phone — and an ergonomic palm rest for your trackpad hand (assuming youíre not a leftie, of course). The trackpad itself has ďhapticĒ feedback — it responds to touch commands with a slight bump you feel through your finger when you select a function.


Oddly — for such a new (and otherwise tech-laden) vehicle — the NX does not have either Android Auto or Apple CarPlay. On the upside, it has a better-than-average satellite radio antenna. Last week, I test-drove the new Nissan Titan XD and lost SiriusXM reception more often and for longer on the same stretch of road. It has to be the antenna. I have noticed this disparity going from car to car each week. The NX has a pretty good antenna.


It’s interesting that, notwithstanding all the technology the NX’s engine has, the end result is only 235 hp and 22 city, 28 highway. That’s a lot of trouble to go to for not-so-spectacular gains. Go back and read what the RDX manages without all the tech (no turbo/intercooler, no DI/PFI).


Yes, the NX gets slightly better mileage.


But that 1-3 MPG difference is all the difference, in terms of CAFE (Uncle’s fuel economy fatwa) compliance. It is why V6s without turbos are disappearing and being replaced by engines like the NX’s micro four. The cost of this transition is not cheap — and is going to become even less cheap (see here) over the next few years, as the CAFE standard frog-jumps from the current 35.5 MPG to 54.5 MPG.


Dunno about you, but I’d rather have the V6 and no turbo and don’t mind losing 1-3 MPG over it if it saves me a couple thousand up front and god-knows-how-much down the road (and post warranty).


THE BOTTOM LINE


The RX stood out more — but it helped that it stood alone. The field is more crowded now — for the RX and the NX.


The NX isn’t a game-changer like the original RX was, but I think it has enough to stay in the game.


Comments?


www.ericpetersautos.com


*** Photo courtesy of Caricos


The post 2016 Lexus NX200t Review appeared first on National Motorists Association.





© 2009 NMA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TheNewspaper.com Roundup: August 17, 2016 NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2016-08-19 05:05
2016 Buick Cascada Review NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2016-08-19 05:05
TheNewspaper.com Roundup: August 10, 2016 NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2016-08-19 05:05
2016 Chevy Cruze Review NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2016-08-19 05:05
2016 Mini Cooper Convertible Review NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2016-08-19 05:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter