Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > National Motorists Association (NMA) Discussion Group & Forum > NMA Articles
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


NMA Articles National Motorists Association (NMA) Articles

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-02-07
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Virginia’s "Abuser Fees" Get Dumped… For The Moment

NMA Article: Virginia’s "Abuser Fees" Get Dumped… For The Moment

By Eric Peters, Automotive Columnist


lotsofmoney Sometimes, the frog leaps before he’s cooked.


Remember the story about the frog and the pot of boiling water? So long as you raise the water temperature gradually, Mr. Frog doesn’t notice the increasing temperature until it’s too late too get away.


The analogy is used to convey, in easy to understand language, the process of "government creep." We don’t go from freedom to fascism overnight; statism creeps up on us incrementally — one step at a time. And each step, by itself, doesn’t seem all that bad; just another annoyance to deal with — or avoid, if you can. But one day you find yourself  living in a country that looks more like Orwell’s "1984" than the place envisioned by the authors of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.


Government — its laws, its minions, its petty harassments and endless rigmarole — is an omnipresence that is inescapable.


Which brings us to the matter of Virginia’s "abuser fees" — the brainchild of a state lawmaker named Dave Albo.


Albo, who just happened to be a big-time lawyer connected with a firm that specializes in (surprise) defending traffic cases, pushed for — and got — a new law that went into effect last January that imposed unprecedented fines on motorists for traffic infractions, including routine speeding, that ranged as high as $3,000 per incident — on top of whatever fine the court levied for the infraction.


The justification given was that the fees would help fund transportation improvements — and of course, "safety" — that well-worn bray that’s still remarkably effective, despite the obvious cynicism with which it is deployed.  


But Albo and his backers made a mistake. They went for broke — and all at once.


Not only were the fines outrageously high relative to the offense(s); not only did they constitute a "double tap" (violators paid, in effect, two fines) but to add insult to injury, they only applied to in-state drivers. A Virginia motorist convicted of driving 80-something mph on a Virginia highway with a posted speed limit of 65 mph faced a "reckless driving" charge, a court fine of several hundred dollars — plus an "abuser fee" of more than $1,000. But an out of state driver caught doing exactly the same thing only got the court fine; the "abuser fees" weren’t applicable.


Seem fair to you?


Virginians felt the same way — and lawmakers got an earful of a different sort of abuse. Just one year after Albo’s Law went into effect, it is on the verge of being repealed in total. State lawmakers are even taking the rare procedural step of seeing to it that when the law repealing the fees is passed, it will go into effect immediately. No waiting until January 2009.


The water is that hot.


So the "abuser fees" will go; but it may be only a temporary victory. Albo and his friends will realize, if they haven’t already, that they overplayed their hand. Gradualism is the key. Next time, the "abuser fees" will only apply to indefensible acts — DWI, vehicular manslaughter resulting from gross negligence — etc. Then, the law will be expanded to the next-down category of offenses. Things not quite so bad — but still hard to make excuses for. Few will complain. It will become accepted practice — and precedent. Other states will pass similar laws. There will be uniformity — and reciprocity.


A few years will pass. Then, someone — perhaps Albo himself — will propose that the fines be applied to yet more offenses. "Public safety!" will be the cry. And just as seat belt laws went from no-argument laws requiring that small children be restrained to "primary enforcement" laws that empower police to pull adults over for failing to "buckle up" — so, too, will the "abuser fees" eventually encompass routine (and purely technical) infractions such as simple speeding.


And we will have come full circle.


There’s just too much money at stake; too much potential control over the Masses to be passed up for long.


To paraphrase Arnold: They’ll be back. Count on it.


And next time, we will probably not notice the water’s getting warm again; at least, not before it’s too late to jump.


Comments?
www.ericpetersautos.com


ShareThis







© 2008 NMA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter