Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > National Motorists Association (NMA) Discussion Group & Forum > NMA Articles
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


NMA Articles National Motorists Association (NMA) Articles

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2010-06-27
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Guilty in Ohio: Speeding Convictions by the Art of Observation

NMA Article: Guilty in Ohio: Speeding Convictions by the Art of Observation



By Gary Biller, NMA Executive Director


As outlined in an NMA email alert sent to Association members nationwide in early June, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that a driver can be convicted of speeding based on a police officer’s observation of vehicle speed, aligning Ohio law with that of several other states that already have bought into the notion that visual speed estimation is a skill rather than guesswork.


Need a radar or laser reading to judge how fast a car is going? Nope. The officer’s visual estimate is good enough despite a paucity of evidence that human beings can, with consistency, gauge accurately how fast a vehicle is going under a variety of weather, road, and traffic conditions by simply watching it from a distance. A few hours of “training” and a certificate is all an officer needs to be considered a reliable practitioner in the art of ascertaining the travel speed of a car by observation.


Much has been, and will continue to be, written about the Ohio ruling. More importantly, we hope it raises the consciousness of the public that speeding convictions in many states are obtained by relying on testimony which is based on a method not supported by scientific study.


The NMA has been flooded with email traffic expressing alarm and concern about the implications of courts giving judicial notice to what is, at best, a questionable method of determining how fast a vehicle is going. One concerned Ohio citizen put into words what most of us are thinking. He sent the following letter to his state representative and senator:


On June 2nd, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that a person can be convicted of speeding merely by a police officer’s visual estimate of speed.


This is an incredible blow to fairness. How can an innocent driver defend himself against a mistaken officer who can deem you guilty just by his visual guess? The officer will always be right, and you are guilty just “because I said so.”


I realize that an officer can claim that is he “trained” to make an accurate visual guess. Common sense tells us this is absurd. Just imagine all the variables that can skew that guess from day to day.


Police officers are only human; we must hold them to a higher standard than this.


We are in an economy where towns, counties, and states are scrambling to meet budgets and make ends meet.


We are seeing revenue-hungry Ohio towns set up more speed traps and allow the deployment of privately owned and operated automated ticket cameras. Such petty infractions as not having a vehicle’s headlights illuminated whenever its windshield wipers are on can result in a fine of up to $150 in the state.


The general public is becoming increasingly aware that “traffic enforcement” is now driven far more by the desire for revenue than for the purpose of public safety.


This is a slippery slope. The average law-abiding citizen, who once respected those who enforce traffic safety, now mistrust them, and see only an ambush for the purpose of fleecing the ensnared victim.


I must assume the recent Supreme Court ruling was simply a clarification of existing state law. If so, the law is wrong and unjust, and should be changed.


More people should speak out against the Ohio ruling because it gives credence to an unproven and highly questionable method of estimating vehicle speed, a method that the outcome of many speeding verdicts will unfortunately rely upon.


Are You A NMA Member? If not, read about the benefits and then join!



Guilty in Ohio: Speeding Convictions by the Art of Observation


Further Reading:


© 2009 NMA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ohio Appeals Court: No Speeding Tickets for Fast Sounding Cars NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-12-13 14:46
Avoid Speeding Tickets: The Value Of A Good Radar Detector NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2009-09-25 12:24
Do Speeding Tickets Deter Drivers From Speeding? NMA Reporter NMA Articles 1 2009-05-18 21:46
How To Fight A Michigan Speeding Ticket NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-11-26 11:32
The Hidden Costs Of A Simple Speeding Ticket NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-09-30 15:46


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:04.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter