Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > National Motorists Association (NMA) Discussion Group & Forum > NMA Articles
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


NMA Articles National Motorists Association (NMA) Articles

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2009-07-14
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation California Supreme Court: Breathalyzer Results Can Be Challenged

NMA Article: California Supreme Court: Breathalyzer Results Can Be Challenged

california-supreme-court

An article in the Los Angeles Times late last week brought attention to the California Supreme Court’s recent ruling that Breathalyzer findings can be challenged in court:


Under the law, a suspected drunk driver can submit to either a blood test, which measures the amount of alcohol in the blood, or a breath test. Alcohol levels in a breath sample are converted mathematically to derive a blood-alcohol percentage. In California, a person is legally drunk when his or her blood-alcohol level is 0.08% or higher.


The standard formula for converting breath results to blood-alcohol levels is not accurate for everyone, however, and can vary depending on an individual’s medical condition, gender, temperature, the atmospheric pressure and the precision of the measuring device, the court said.


“The question is whether a defendant who has a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.08% or more measured by breath is entitled to rebut that presumption that he was under the influence” in certain cases, Justice Carol A. Corrigan wrote. The court’s answer was yes.


As the article explains, one of the reasons for the ruling was the potential for Breathalyzer readings that overstate the amount of alcohol in a person’s blood:


Even though experts say the standard ratio used to derive a blood-alcohol concentration from breath generally approximates or even underestimates the amount of alcohol the driver consumed, they also agree that Breathalyzer results may sometimes overestimate the amount of alcohol in the blood.


Thursday’s ruling permits defendants in some cases to challenge those results based on mathematical ratios.


“Evidence casting doubt on the accuracy of the breath-to-blood conversion ratio is just as relevant as other evidence rebutting the presumption of intoxication from a breath test result, such as evidence that the defendant had a high tolerance for alcohol or performed well in field sobriety testing,” Corrigan wrote.


Jamie L. Popper, the appellate defense lawyer in the case, had this to say:


“The situation currently is that juries are led to believe that when a person blows into the breath test, the blood-alcohol measure that breath test gives is a fact, when all a breath test is is a measure.”


For more on this topic, you can read our previous article on Breathalzyers:

Itís Just A Decimal Point: The Dirty Secret Behind Breathalyzers


And you can read the full Los Angeles Times article here.


Are You A NMA Member? If not, read about the benefits and then join!


California Supreme Court: Breathalyzer Results Can Be Challenged


Further Reading:


© 2009 NMA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
California Supreme Court Admits, Ignores Breathalyzer Flaws NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-07-15 15:17
Minnesota Supreme Court Orders Access to Breathalyzer Source Code NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-05-04 20:02
California Supreme Court Protects Drivers with Temporary Tags NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-12-17 10:23
California Supreme Court to Review Red Light Cameras NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-09-28 11:30
Trial By Declaration: Fight A Traffic Ticket Without Going To Court NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-05-17 19:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter