Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > National Motorists Association (NMA) Discussion Group & Forum > NMA Articles
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


NMA Articles National Motorists Association (NMA) Articles

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2009-01-30
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Fordís 5 Biggest Flops Of The Past Twenty Years

NMA Article: Fordís 5 Biggest Flops Of The Past Twenty Years

the_flop

By Eric Peters, Automotive Columnist


Selling cars is easy — if you have cars to sell that people want to buy. Unfortunately, America’s Big Three have had more than their share of bad ideas over the past 20 years.


Let’s look at some of Ford’s flops.


Lincoln Mark VIII (1993-1998)


This car killed what had been a very successful franchise for Ford. In the ’80s, the Mark VII was thought of as an American SL500. It had hunky good looks and was powered by the same basic drivetrain used in the Mustang GT. It also had an air-adjustable suspension, bolstered euro-style sport buckets, full gauge package and was one of the first American-brand cars to come with high-capacity four-wheel-disc brakes with ABS. The thing sold very well — until Ford restyled it for the 1993 model year and christened the result the Mark VIII. This car looked like a partially melted Mark VII.


Even though it had a much more powerful engine (Ford’s new 4.6 liter “cammer” V-8 with 290 hp in the top-of-the-line LSC) its pulling power with buyers was far weaker than the old 5.0 powered Mark VII. After five listless years and ever-declining sales, Ford dropped the Mark — and dropped out of the luxury sport coupe market completely.


Ford said the market for high-end coupes just wasn’t there. But it would have been more accurate to say the market for Ford-built high-end coupes wasn’t there.


Which brings us to our next contestant…. .




Ford Thunderbird (2002-2005)


An icon was revived (briefly) that was greeted (initially) with lots of enthusiasm but quickly became a money-loser for Ford — mainly because most people simply weren’t willing to spend nearly $40k for a car that was “just” a Ford. Dealer gouging for the first cars off the line made matters even worse. Most of the cars ended up just sitting there. And sitting there… .


Some industry analysts argued in their post mortems that the car might have done better had it been sold through Lincoln dealers — the thinking being that high-end customers expect a high-end dealership experience. And there was probably something to that. Of all the big bucks coupes out there, only Chevy gets away with selling $50k Corvettes through the same outlets that also sell $10,000 Aveos. But the Corvette can get away with it because it has a strong market presence and a loyal following — with an unbroken history going back to the 1950s.††


But probably more lethal was the reborn T-Bird’s anachronistic personality. While other modern cars have dabbled with “retro” design, the T-Bird really was retro all over. It seemed to be built for laid-back cruising — something no one does anymore. We live in a frantic, aggressive, stressful world. Few of us take our time doing anything — let alone driving. The latter-day T-Bird† was a joy to take out on the Blue Ridge Parkway or Skyline drive — and amble along at 45 mph enjoying the scenery.


But it didn’t feel right anyplace else.


As a time machine, it was brilliant. Unfortunately for Ford, most buyers weren’t looking for a $40k trip down memory lane.


Lincoln Blackwood (2002-2002)


Who needs a $50k pick-up with a functionally useless bed?


Apparently, next to no one.


Lincoln’s uber-luxury pick-up fell through the thin ice faster than a jumping up and down Oprah. It lasted just one year in production — a measure of the disastrous decision to build the thing in the first place.


The problem wasn’t price; after all, Ford had no trouble selling Navigator SuVs for just as much — or even more. But unlike the Navigator, the Blackwood was useless for anything other than proving that rich people can be just as dumb as everyone else. Or maybe not — because this time, even the rich said no thanks.


The short bed was never intended to carry any of the stuff that pick-ups usually carry. Carpet, fine woods and brushed metal trim don’t exactly mix with stacks of 2×4s or bags of cement — or even a wet Labrador Retriever. That’s if you could access the bed at all. To do that, you had to raise a clumsy, power-activated tonneau cover that further limited the already minimal usefulness of this “truck.”


The piece de resistance? The Blackwood was sold as a 2WD only — making it the only full-frame, full-size truck offered for sale which couldn’t even be ordered with 4WD.


Nothing like a 15 mpg, 2WD truck that can’t carry (or even tow) much of anything and which is more skittery in snow than a ‘78 Caprice Classic with an open rear end.


Mercury Cougar (1999-2002)


Just keeping Mercury around is arguably one of Ford’s biggest mistakes of the past 20 years.


Thirty or forty years ago, it made sense for Ford to have a “mid-level” brand. Buyers often spent their entire car-buying lives within the Ford Family of Fine Cars, moving from Joe Sixpack Fords to almost-luxury Mercurys - and from Mercury to Lincoln, if they became successful enough. But that was before the flood of Japanese imports reduced Ford Motor Co.’s share of the American car market by more than half — and before buyers routinely switched brands if they found a better deal somewhere else.


The last Cougar was at least a unique model — unlike the previous versions, which began life in the ’60s as tarted up Mustangs and went through the ’80s as rebadged Thunderbirds. It actually wasn’t a bad car; it’s just that it wasn’t an especially great one. Many saw it as a chick car; others weren’t sure about its iffy styling. Even Ford seemed unsure what to do with it.


In V-6 form, it offered decent get up and go, but Ford never developed it further. An “S” version with a high-output engine and sport suspension was considered — and might have given the car some bona fides — but it never got released. So the Cougar just sat there, unsure of itself and without a real reason for its existence.


A hugely successful automaker such as Toyota can get away with some soggy offerings (see: Camry Solara) by dint of the vast pool of loyalists who just want a “Toyota” … any Toyota.


But Mercury hasn’t got that kind of pull — and the cat that no one wanted was put to sleep after the 2002 model run.


Lincoln LS (2000-2006)


This one’s upsetting because the LS† had definite potential. Arguably it’s the best sedan Lincoln put out in 25 years. But the management eggheads decided to drop it instead of correcting the few little things that were actually wrong with it.


The LS sedan was Ford’s attempt to build a credible rear-wheel-drive luxury-performance sedan comparable to a BMW 3-Series. And it was credible — right down to its available manual transmission and trunk-mounted battery. Handling was excellent; ride quality very close to the best German sport sedans. Buyers could choose a punchy 252 hp V-8 if they sought more power than the 210 hp 3 liter V-6 offered. This engine was sourced from Jaguar’s “AJ” series V-8 and had both the raw power and the sophisticated demeanor to stack itself up against the very best Euro powerplants.


As a driver’s car, there was little to fault. The LS could corner; it had high-speed legs. It felt good when pushed. Motor Trend gave it “Car of the Year” honors its first year out. And yet, it failed.


Que pasa?


Partially, a clash of car and brand (and buyer). Lincoln, as a brand, was not BMW — even if the LS, itself, was a credible BMW in training. Lincoln buyers were (and still are) mostly Blue Hairs who want soft seats, wire wheels and automatic transmissions. The typical Lincoln customer had about as much interest in a sport sedan like the LS as Clay Aiken has in Pamela Anderson.


And BMW buyers weren’t crossing over, either.


The LS did have some significant flaws, too — in the cabin department especially. The layout and materials rose to the mediocre — at best. While the handling/driving dynamics were good enough to play with the Bavarians, the interior was Wal Mart all the way.


Still, it was a damn good effort — and given persistence and fixes where needed, Lincoln could have made a go of it. That’s what a Japanese car company would have done (Lexus was laughed at initially; no one’s laughing now — least of all Ford shareholders). But as is usual practice for an American car company, Ford just gave up. Lincoln went back to selling overstuffed old man’s cars — including the new Zephry/MKS.


Which is probably why Lincoln isn’t even an also-ran in today’s luxury car segment.


The saddest words in the entire English language — what might have been — sum up the situation nicely.


Comments?

www.ericpetersautos.com (Click on “Forum”)


Image Credit


Are You A NMA Member? If not, read about the benefits and then join!


Ford’s 5 Biggest Flops Of The Past Twenty Years


Further Reading:






© 2008 NMA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:29.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter