Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > News
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


News Domestic/International news and information about speedtraps and [automated] traffic enforcement and associated political activism.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2010-11-11
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Default Vote NO on AZ Prop 112

Camera Fraud Article: Vote NO on AZ Prop 112


This one is pretty simple folks. Proposition 112, if passed would make it much harder for citizens initiatives to be voted on. That should mean a lot to this crowd because the current citizens initiatives to ban photo radar and red light cameras in Arizona cities would require many more volunteer hours to get the required signatures… 50% more hours, to be specific.


Prop 112 would not only require 50% more signatures but it also shortens the length of time allowed to collect them by 2 months.


How this passed through the State Legislature of AZ is a huge mystery to all of us. What they are saying, in effect, is that they only want lawmakers aka “career politicians” to have any say in what laws are passed. It sounds like they all want to lose their jobs because that’s pretty damn good reason to vote them all out.


Only one proposition on the ballot this year was put on by citizens. The other 8 were added by legislature. Of course, Prop 112 doesn’t require more signatures for political candidates to get on the ballot making it extremely one-sided and hypocritical. What this means is that politicians won’t have to pay more money to run their campaigns in the form of signature collector fees. But conversely, it’s okay for them to require more of the citizens. This is unacceptable.


Please vote NO on proposition 112. A no vote would retain the following requirements of citizen initiatives without making them more difficult:


**10% of previous voter count.


**July 1st signature turn-in deadline for general and mid-term elections.







Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Texas: Officials Ignoring Vote on Red Light Camera Ban NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2010-11-11 17:09
Texas: Photo Ticket Firm Gears Up To Fight Public Vote NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2010-04-24 04:59
Baytown, Texas Residents Demand Vote on Red Light Cameras NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2010-01-02 17:33
Ohio Supreme Court Clears Anti-Speed Camera Referendum for Vote NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-10-23 14:20
Don’t Forget To Vote Today! NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-11-07 00:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter