Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum

Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum (https://www.speedtraphunter.net/)
-   News (https://www.speedtraphunter.net/news/)
-   -   Another One For The “Each Ticket is Reviewed by an Officer” Folder (https://www.speedtraphunter.net/news/2577-another-one-each-ticket-reviewed-officer-folder.html)

NMA Reporter 2010-07-28 22:35

Another One For The “Each Ticket is Reviewed by an Officer” Folder
 
<b>Camera Fraud Article: Another One For The “Each Ticket is Reviewed by an Officer” Folder</b><br/><br/><p>In photo enforcement programs across the country, the claims continue to be made that “each violation is reviewed by an officer” before a ticket is mailed. The reality is that violations are either NOT reviewed by officers or the standards of evidence are much lower than anyone would imagine. In many cases, the camera companies and the municipalities are just eager to bring in a check so they send out a ticket regardless of the consequences to the innocent.</p>
<p>Take this recent AZ DPS photo ticket, for example, where it is not even possible to distinguish any features of the driver whatsoever (click on photo to enlarge). This didn’t stop Redflex from mailing the bogus ticket in the hopes that someone who didn’t know better would help them boost their profit margins.</p>
<p><a href="http://camerafraud.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/phototicket.jpg"><img src="http://camerafraud.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/phototicket.jpg?w=300&h=142" alt="" title="phototicket" width="300" height="142" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4898" /></a></p>
<p>According to the IIHS, the driver of the vehicle is NOT the owner of the vehicle over 28% of the time, which means that photo enforcement has a built-in 28% identify error rate even before we consider equipment malfunctions, corporate-owned vehicles, missing/ineligible plates, and system and processing errors.</p>
<p>Imagine for a moment what this country’s founders would say about a law enforcement system with a built-in error rate greater than 1 in 4 where the recipient must prove that he wasn’t driving in order to be found innocent. Imagine if you would re-elect a local sheriff if their department arrested the wrong person over 28% of the time. When did Arizona decide that a law enforcement system that heavily burdens the innocent is what we want?</p>
<p>Oh that’s right, the people or Arizona have never voted on this issue! Jan Brewer: <strong>Put photo enforcement on the ballot!</strong></p>
<br /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/camerafraud.wordpress.com/4897/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/camerafraud.wordpress.com/4897/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/camerafraud.wordpress.com/4897/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/camerafraud.wordpress.com/4897/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/camerafraud.wordpress.com/4897/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/camerafraud.wordpress.com/4897/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/camerafraud.wordpress.com/4897/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/camerafraud.wordpress.com/4897/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/camerafraud.wordpress.com/4897/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/camerafraud.wordpress.com/4897/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=camerafraud.wordpress.com&blog=4530959& post=4897&subd=camerafraud&ref=&feed=1" />
<br/><br/><span align="center"></span>


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:13.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter