Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > News
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


News Domestic/International news and information about speedtraps and [automated] traffic enforcement and associated political activism.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2009-06-01
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Default Fun with DPS Public Records Requests

Camera Fraud Article: Fun with DPS Public Records Requests



Getting an eyeful

Your Taxpayer Dollars at Work, being used to monitor political opposition.


It’s no secret that CameraFRAUD demonstrations have been closely monitored by Redflex’s enforcement arm, also known as the Arizona Department of Public Safety. More specifically, I’ve always felt a little insulted that the DPS would take three officers off the streets during rush hour traffic and reassign them to conduct blatant surveillance on a peaceful protest.


As such, I wanted to know what information they were looking to gather from their surveillance , so I asked. I submitted a polite letter, cited the right statutes, and a means to contact me. Just to make it official, I sent it via certified mail. Behold, DPS’ response…







That’s it? Forgive me if I’m a little skeptical. Am I to believe that DPS sent three cops to watch a protest, through binoculars, during a state-wide budget crunch, and there’s no paper on this?


I received this response from DPS in a very timely manner. The request was dropped in the mail on May 26th, received by DPS on May 27th. And in the space of two days, they fire off a response? This, despite the fact that DPS’ website specifically states to expect a 15 to 20  day wait for requests to be processed.


DPS’ Public Records Unit is either really on the ball, or the request was just rubber-stamped with a generic, ’stop asking questions and leave us alone’ response. See more of DPS’ surveillance pics here.


Editor’s Note: Perhaps the time for a follow-up letter is in order. They acknowledge being at the event, so the question now becomes “who gave the order to surveil such an event, and what was the motivation for such an order?”






Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alaska Senator Championed Speed Camera Program Rejected by Public NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-05-28 11:11
Group Finds Toll Roads Not in Public Interest NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-04-16 21:23
Louisiana: Public Slams Traffic Cameras in Referendum NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-04-05 23:34
GAO Questions Wisdom of Public Private Partnerships NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-07-29 00:19
The Traveling Public Can Go Elsewhere NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-07-04 22:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter