Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > News
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


News Domestic/International news and information about speedtraps and [automated] traffic enforcement and associated political activism.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2009-05-13
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Default City “Can’t Afford” To Pay Back Photo Radar Fines

Camera Fraud Article: City “Can’t Afford” To Pay Back Photo Radar Fines


Eh? Manitoba can't afford to refund illegal fines.

Refunds? We don't have no stinkin' refunds!


From the too-bad-so-sad department:


The politician in charge of the Winnipeg Police Service says the city cannot afford to reimburse people who have already paid their photo radar tickets… Gord Steeves, chair of the city’s standing policy committee on protection and community services, said the hit to the city’s revenue will be between $3 million and $10 million, depending on how many fines have to be paid back. “We don’t have the extra money in our budget to do refunds,” he said…


Steeves is also concerned about the city’s five-year contract with ACS Public Sector Solutions, which operates the photo radar system. He isn’t sure what will happen to that contract if the volume of tickets drops significantly.


The company is poised to earn $25 million over the contract, but the deal depends on a certain volume of tickets to cover costs, said Steeves…


The issue has been a hot topic of controversy since provincial court judge Norm Sundstrom dismissed nine photo radar tickets earlier this year.


According to provincial law, the temporary speed limit when passing construction zones is 60 kilometres per hour. Although the drivers whose tickets were dismissed had exceeded that limit, they were not going faster than the regular 80 km/h speed limit for that particular roadway, and there were no workers present.


Without the workers, there was no safety issue, so the regular speed limit should apply, Sundstrom ruled.






Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arizona: History Underscores Unpopularity of Photo Radar NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-30 14:50
Arizona: Freeway Photo Radar Ban Proceeds NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-30 14:50
Pinal County, Arizona Bans Photo Radar NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-05 23:26
Photo Radar Ticketing Ends in Pinal County NMA Reporter News 0 2009-01-03 00:44
Arizona: Man Taping Photo Radar Protest Arrested NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-09-01 16:46


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter