Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Law Enforcement > Law Enforcement Personnel
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


Law Enforcement Personnel Discussion group from and for the perspective of law enforcement personnel—intended to create a productive dialogue. WARNING: Verbally abusive/insulting posts from any forum member will be immediately removed along with your membership.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)   IP: 192.168.0.1
Old 2007-08-11
Speed Trap Hunter's Avatar
Speed Trap Hunter Speed Trap Hunter is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2007 Jun
Posts: 32
Speed Trap Hunter has disabled reputation
Default Lifting the Ban on Radar Detector Usage

Bill of Rights: IV Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

In this day an age of increased domestic surveillence and questions about our privacy rights as citizens, I have heard claims, by some, that we citizens do not have any implied rights to privacy on the open roads as drivers.

My interpretation of our IV amendment suggests otherwise. If we are to be secure in our rights of persons and effects, musn't that security of rights directly extend to us persons as drivers in our vehicles where ever we may be?

If this is indeed, so, as I believe, don't we, as U.S. citizens, have the right to be permitted to at least be aware of such 'searches'--in the form of traffic monitoring?

In the instance of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the District of Columbia, would that not mean that we as drivers have the right to use a radar detector?

To that end, may I suggest the consideration of lifting the ban of such devices--as Connecticut wisely did some years ago? Furthermore, shouldn't professional drivers/truckers be afforded these same rights?

Please be mindful of the following:

"Freedom is not defined by safety. Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens to live without government interference."

Ron Paul, 09 AUG 04
Sincerely,

STH


Speed Trap Hunter's Sig:Experience the latest working countermeasures in the real-world of actual driving:=====

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Loyalty is above All, save Honor.

Building, A Future Worth Creating, Today.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arizona: History Underscores Unpopularity of Photo Radar NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-30 14:50
Pinal County, Arizona Bans Photo Radar NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-05 23:26
Photo Radar Ticketing Ends in Pinal County NMA Reporter News 0 2009-01-03 00:44
Radar Jammers, Passive Radar Scramblers, and Active Police Radar Jamming Veil Guy Radar Jammers 0 2008-09-06 07:42
Spectre IV RDD: Applied Concepts New Radar Detector Detector Now on Sale in U.S. Veil Guy Radar Detector Detector 0 2008-02-07 16:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter