Northeast Laser Jammer test results for June '09

Veil Guy · #2 (**permalink**) IP: 192.168.2.1 2009-06-29

Thank you, sir.

I'll be anxiously awaiting the outcome of this little experiment.

I have already seen Veil + Blinder M2x outperform a Blinder M4x alone on a large SUV. I suspect the same thing would hold for any ALCM, such as a one head LI versus a two head LI.

By getting rid of the reflection of the headlights/foglights and possibly the number plate area any/all jammers will have a far easier time defeating the lidar/lasing system. It's common sense really.

But actually seeing it would be especially nice and I have been patiently/quietly waiting for someone with the verve enough to actually try it and see.

Veil Guy

happya$$ · #3 (**permalink**) IP: 32.140.0.83 2009-06-30

I am confident that MANY if not ALL of those PT's that the LI and ZR3 suffered could have been eliminated or DRAMATICALLY reduced if passive counter measures like Veil were used

TSi+WRX · #4 (**permalink**) IP: 76.190.193.28 2009-07-02

My question is the same as happya$$'s -

What the heck?

Who/what does Stealth Enthusiast represent?

Speed Trap Hunter · #5 (**permalink**) IP: 166.198.99.79 2009-06-29

I really like the fact that you repeatedly continued firing after any given PT was achieved at any given distance during your frontal passes.

I have found in my own experiments/tests certain PTs may and do occur at certain distances and sometimes just at certain distances/moments.

These kind of results do really help, I believe, in better understanding the actual dynamics that are going on.

Nicely done.

STH