Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-08-24
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Washington, Ohio Ballot Initiatives Scare City Councils

Article: Washington, Ohio Ballot Initiatives Scare City Councils

We Demand a Vote rallyCity councils in Washington state and Cincinnati, Ohio are dropping plans to install red light cameras after anti-camera ballot initiatives gather an increasing level of public support. In Washington state, one polls showed Initiative 985 enjoys majority support across all demographic and political categories. This congestion reduction ballot proposal would, among other things, direct all revenue from photo tickets to a statewide fund dedicated to congestion relief (view initiative details). After the referendum was certified for the November ballot, Wenatchee City Council became less interested in installing the traffic cameras the city council had previously approved.

"We kind of pulled back right at the end," Mayor Dennis Johnson told the Wenatchee World newspaper. "
"I'm not going to get involved in doing accounting for a state agency... We would have the state looking over our shoulder at records and all of that."

In an interview with TheNewspaper, ReduceCongestion.org co-sponsor Tim Eyman said he was thrilled that his proposal was causing cities to re-think their plans to use both red light cameras and speed cameras. Earlier this year, Aberdeen, Mill Creek and Yakima similarly dropped photo ticketing plans.

In Cincinnati last week, WeDemandAVote coalition activists turned in 13,000 signatures -- more than twice the number needed -- to place a charter amendment on the November ballot banning red light cameras. As a result of the obvious public outcry against the idea of photo ticketing, the city council rejected a proposal to begin installing cameras by a 4-4 vote (the vote would have been a decisive 5-4 against had an absent council member, on the record against cameras, been present). Coalition co-chairman Josh Krekeler vowed to press ahead with the ballot initiative to ensure the city does not install cameras in the future.

"We need a new direction and a new set of priorities that do not involve needlessly oppressing the citizenry and further constructing a police state," Krekeler said in a statement. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Third Ohio City Proposes Camera Ban NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-12-12 15:57
Second Ohio City Votes to Ban Red Light Cameras NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 1 2008-11-07 00:57
Ohio City Lays Off Workers as Red Light Camera Revenue Falls NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-09-03 19:26
Ohio City Caught Distorting Violation Drop NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-06-29 12:30
Ohio City Caught Distorting Violation Drop NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-06-29 12:30


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:04.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter