Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:

Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-08-04
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Arizona Cities Develop New Speed Camera Tricks

Article: Arizona Cities Develop New Speed Camera Tricks

Photo radar warningLocal jurisdictions in Arizona are finding new ways to squeeze extra revenue out of motorists. Now that the Arizona Department of Public Safety has assumed the duty of operating speed cameras on freeways -- with the profit going to the state's general fund -- cities have turned to creative methods to maximize the return from their local photo radar initiatives.

Prescott Valley's private speed camera company, Redflex, has found a way to charge motorists an extra $26 fee, for example. The Daily Courier newspaper reported that the Australian firm is sending process servers to the homes of motorists who take traffic school courses as permitted by law. Process servers are supposed to be used to provide official notification of a citation to motorists -- for a fee. Motorists who take a traffic school course before their court date have fulfilled their obligation under the law.

The Courier cited the case of Rodney Szabo, 43, who was accused by a machine of driving 36 MPH in a 25 zone. He paid $130 for a traffic school class on June 21 but received on July 16 two separate notices from the court. One was confirmation that he had attended the course and the second was a bill for $26. When Szabo contested the fee, Judge Keith Carson insisted that he pay.

Scottsdale is similarly taking advantage of a loophole in state law to trap motorists. In 2006, lawmakers mandated the use of signs to serve as a warning to drivers that they should slow down before reaching a speed camera. But this law only applies to cameras operating in locations where the speed limit is 45 MPH or greater. Drivers accustomed to seeing the signs have become conditioned to believe photo radar is not in use if no signs are visible.

"Most cities do put out the signs anyway no matter what the speed limit is," the law's author, state Representative Bob Robson (R-Chandler), told the East Valley Tribune newspaper. "It's a fairness issue and a delicate balance between right and wrong."

The Tribune reported that Scottsdale often does not use warning signs. As a result, its mobile camera program generates up to $72,000 in monthly revenue. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Majority Of Speed Camera Photos In Arizona Are Unusable NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2009-05-20 10:09
Red Light Camera and Speed Camera CrimeLine NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-07 22:11
Arizona Speed Camera Contract Can be Canceled NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-12-24 04:34
Arizona: Red Light Camera Tickets a Speed Camera NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-11-26 11:32
The Effect Of Speed Limits On Actual Travel Speeds NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-08-24 22:19

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20.

©2019 SpeedTrapHunter