Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:

Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-07-04
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation UK: Speed Camera Operator Rigged the System

Article: UK: Speed Camera Operator Rigged the System

ipcc logoA UK speed camera operator, desperate to keep his position as the top ticket issuer, manipulated evidence to obtain more convictions, according to a report by a government watchdog agency. The UK Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) announced yesterday that the civilian employee of the Lancashire Constabulary was fired at the conclusion of an inquiry that opened in October 2007.

"The IPCC's managed investigation found that on a number of occasions between September 2006 and May 2007 the speed camera technician had failed to correctly calibrate the mobile speed camera he was using," the commission report stated. "This meant that the man, who started his job in September 2006, failed to carry out the set procedures to ensure the distance measurement and alignment were correct before and after the camera was operated. Failure to do this meant it could not be guaranteed the camera had worked correctly."

The IPCC examined 435 videotapes of motorists convicted by the civilian police employee of speeding. The commission concluded that 41 tapes contained evidence that innocent motorists were wrongly convicted. Of these, 545 motorists either went through the court system and were found guilty or paid their ticket without challenge. These convictions were based on perjury.

"Despite knowing that the correct checks had not been made, the operative, who was the highest performing camera technician in the force in terms of offenses captured, signed documents needed for court cases to certify that the equipment had been working correctly," the report stated.

Now £35,585 (US $70,500) in refunds will be issued and 1635 penalty points against those drivers' licenses lifted. Despite the evidence, the Crown Prosecution Service refused to file any charges against the operator. Lancashire Constabulary also insisted that it has no ticket quotas and did not provide any incentive for the operator to focus on issuing the greatest number of tickets possible.

The IPCC is comprised of sixteen commissioners, none of whom have served in law enforcement,. They are responsible for conducting independent investigations into public complaints regarding police misconduct. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UK Cancels 24,889 Invalid Speed Camera Tickets NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-06-21 09:42
France, UK: Parked Cars Receive Speed Camera Tickets NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-03-28 15:31
Red Light Camera and Speed Camera CrimeLine NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-07 22:11
The Effect Of Speed Limits On Actual Travel Speeds NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-08-24 22:19
The Ultimate Beginners Guide to Speed Trap Defence SpeedCheetahAl Cheetah 1 2007-11-07 23:02

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46.

©2019 SpeedTrapHunter