Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:

Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2016-08-19
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Texas: Camera Company Lawyer Embraces Ballot Referendum Reform

Article: Texas: Camera Company Lawyer Embraces Ballot Referendum Reform

Andy TaylorTexas activists have been blocked several times from using the ballot initiative process to force a public vote on red light cameras. Now the man most responsible for denying citizens a say insists that he is an ally in the fight to reform the the referendum process in the Lone Star State. Andy Taylor, the lawyer of choice for American Traffic Solutions (ATS) in Texas, testified Monday before the Texas state Senate Intergovernmental Relations committee regarding the need to update the law to remove barriers to ballot initiatives that he skillfully exploited for the benefit of his client, ATS, and municipalities that use cameras.

"I've seen a lot in terms of how the playing field is not level between the government on the one hand and the citizen on the other," Taylor testified. "That's because, in my opinion, of a failure -- a gap -- in the law."

Taylor has taken on clients who run ballot initiatives on other hot political topics, but his ties to the photo enforcement industry remain deep. He recently formed the TaylorHittner law firm with George Hittner, former general counsel for ATS.

Taylor used the imbalance in the referendum law on behalf of several municipalities desperate to preserve their photo ticketing programs. Taylor created fake organizations and used random individuals to disguise the role ATS played in the legal attack against residents and their right to vote. As part of his take-no-prisoners approach, Taylor argued in court documents that anyone who opposes red light cameras must be a racist. ATS also engaged in personal attacks and lawsuits against citizens who filed anti-camera petitions in an attempt to dissuade them from participating in the political process. Taylor technically succeed in the legal fight in Houston, though the cameras were taken down after the mayor allowed the vote to take place.

In the Houston suburbs, anti-camera activist H. F. Van Der Grinten testified before the committee about how his group collected 3000 valid signatures that should have triggered a vote on red light cameras in Sugar Land. When he sought advice from lawyers on what he could do to overcome Taylor's legal maneuvers, he was told the court fight would be extremely expensive.

"We lacked the financial resources to do so," Van Der Grinten said. "So automated red light camera enforcement continues in Sugar Land."

Last month, the Texas Court of Appeals reversed a lower court that had blocked a red light camera ban from appearing on the ballot in the city of Cleveland (view ruling). Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:26.

©2019 SpeedTrapHunter