Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-04-18
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Study Finds Cost Effective Methods of Reducing Stop Sign Accidents

Article: Study Finds Cost Effective Methods of Reducing Stop Sign Accidents

Stop AheadThe Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) last month released a pair of studies evaluating the benefit of simple measures municipalities can take to reduce the number of crashes at intersections controlled by stop signs. The agency commissioned the studies as part of a larger effort to find cost-effective engineering alternatives. The precise impact of increasing the reflectivity of stop signs and using pavement warnings before now had never been examined in a controlled study.

Researchers first measured the effect of "stop ahead" pavement markings that warn motorists of upcoming intersections. The study included eight sites in Arkansas and nine in Maryland to determine the change in the number of accidents after the warnings were put in place.

"The aggregate analysis in Arkansas and Maryland indicates that stop ahead pavement markings may significantly reduce total crashes at unsignalized intersections," the report found.

A conservative analysis of the data suggested the markings created a fifteen percent reduction in accidents at a very low cost. On an annualized basis a local government would spend between $78 and $366 per intersection approach to keep the warnings in good condition.

The second study examined the use of photoreflective sheeting to make stop signs more visible at night. Researchers looked at 231 sites in Connecticut and 108 sites in South Carolina to discover that the benefit was limited to certain types of intersections -- mostly low-volume rural locations -- that have a particular nighttime crash problem.

"At higher volume intersections, there are more visual cues for minor road motorists approaching a stop-controlled intersection," the report found. "However, given the low cost of this strategy, even with conservative assumptions, only a very modest reduction in crashes is needed to justify its use."

A set of extra-reflective signs costs about $200 per intersection to install. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Texas: Study Finds Slim Justification for Camera Installation NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-05-12 18:03
Houston Red Light Camera Report Undermines TxDOT Camera Study NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 1 2009-01-01 08:24
Police Officer Gives Himself $21,000 Raise Using Stop Sign Tickets NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-07-20 20:33


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:45.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter