Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:

Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-04-18
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Sober Arizona, Oregon Motorists Arrested for DUI

Article: Sober Arizona, Oregon Motorists Arrested for DUI

Dave CoxA number of sober motorists in Arizona and Oregon have been falsely accused of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) and drugs. In Corvallis, Oregon a falsely accused motorist is fighting back.

At the beginning of the month, Brian J. Noakes, 23, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against David Cox, a former award-winning Corvallis Police Officer. Cox had pulled over Noakes last June. Because Noakes had a cold, his eyes were bloodshot. Noting this, Cox accused Noakes of being high behind the wheel and arrested him. When Noakes' wife asked what was going on, Cox threatened to shoot her with his taser. As reported by the Corvallis Gazette-Times newspaper, breath and urine tests confirmed Noakes had been completely sober and free from drugs.

Noakes wants to recover the money he spent on legal fees and impose a monetary punishment on the department for allowing continued harassment of innocent motorists. The suit cites as examples of a pattern the false arrests of motorists Joshua Sauter, Eric Stavale and Carl Feher, all of whom were cleared when chemical testing proved they were not driving while on drugs. Under Oregon law, a DUI arrest cannot be expunged from records, even of those found innocent.

The Phoenix New Times newspaper has documented similar incidents in Arizona. On May 18, 2006, motorist Shannon Wilcutt, 35, stopped at a restaurant with her four-year-old boy for dinner after she had been to the dentist for work on her dentures. She drank one-half of a mimosa and several glasses of water. A patron saw all of the glasses, assumed Wilcutt had been drinking too much and notified the police.

Wilcutt was pulled over and officers reported that "her speech was slow and slurred." Wilcutt explained that without teeth -- her dentures were removed earlier in the day -- her speech was impaired for an obvious reason. But that was enough for police to handcuff and book her while her son, John, watched.

A breathalyzer test claimed Wilcutt's blood alcohol content was .048 -- well under the legal limit of .08. But this test was given after Wilcutt used an inhaler for her asthma, something known to distort the effect of breath alcohol measurement. Police then waited five months to release the results of a definitive blood test that showed her true BAC to be .022. The only drug in her system was a single, legally prescribed hydrocodone pill taken after she finished dinner. Her home was only ten minutes from the restaurant.

Despite the lack of evidence, the county attorney filed three felony charges against Wilcutt, only to drop them in February. Wilcutt spent $12,000 in legal fees to defend her name.

The same thing happened to Diana Sifford, 52. As she drove home from a George Thorogood concert having had a single glass of wine -- her BAC tested at .03 -- she came upon an accident scene. Police were outraged that Sifford passed a parked car too closely and so pulled her over and accused her of DUI. When Sifford volunteered that she took a Vicodin pain pill earlier in the day to fight the pain of a recent back surgery, police charged her with driving under the influence of drugs. A urine test showed no traces of Vicodin or any other drug in her system.

Sifford was jailed overnight and her car impounded. She tried pleading her case without a lawyer in court, but nobody would listen. In January, she spent $3000 for an attorney who was able to limit the damage to a guilty plea for not staying in her lane. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Majority Of Speed Camera Photos In Arizona Are Unusable NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2009-05-20 10:09
Arizona: Man Taping Photo Radar Protest Arrested NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-09-01 16:46
Arizona Cities Develop New Speed Camera Tricks NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-08-04 18:30

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:21.

©2019 SpeedTrapHunter