Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-03-28
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation New York Moving Forward on Congestion Tax

Article: New York Moving Forward on Congestion Tax

David A. PatersonThe New York City Council will hold hearings today to discuss implementing Mayor Michael Bloomberg's plan to tax motorists driving into Manhattan. Newly sworn-in Governor David A. Paterson (D) wasted no time Friday in announcing not only that he supported the mayor's plan to tax motorists to fund busing, but that he would introduce his own legislation to implement it.

"We expect that revenue from the congestion pricing plan will support more than $4.5 billion in needed capital improvements for mass transit," Patterson said in a statement.

Patterson and Bloomberg are trying to land the $354 million bribe offered by federal transportation officials to major cities that showcase the benefits of imposing tolls on existing roads. The federal gas tax money was diverted away from road maintenance and is expected to bankroll the barricades and surveillance infrastructure needed to track and record every automobile entering the city during working hours. Private contractors will earn millions collecting the tolls on behalf of the city and sending citations to motorists whose E-ZPass toll transponder fails to register.

Bloomberg modeled his initial plan on that created by London's socialist mayor, Ken Livingstone. Livingstone's charge, like Bloomberg's, started at a low rate of $8 per day for automobiles and $21 for trucks. Once implemented, however, it quickly soared to $50 per day for politically unfavored family vehicles as Livingstone used "carbon dioxide emissions" as an excuse to charge the maximum rate to certain SUVs, minivans and four-door sedans.

Despite Bloomberg's push, the plan remains unpopular. A Quinnipiac University poll released earlier this month showed that New York City voters opposed the congestion tax by a 56 to 38 percent margin. Another 54 percent believed it was unlikely that the profit generated would actually be spent on improving bus service. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UK Lord Accused of Cheating Congestion Tax NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-19 11:31
London Admits Congestion Charge Failure NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-08-11 21:08
California: Plan Would Impose Congestion Zone in Los Angeles NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-06-18 10:12
New York State Legislature Spikes Congestion Tax NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-04-08 12:25
New York: Congestion Tax to Hit Motorists Hard NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-03-31 09:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:11.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter