Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:

Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2008-03-28
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation North Dakota Supreme Court Slashes Traffic Ticket Profiteering

Article: North Dakota Supreme Court Slashes Traffic Ticket Profiteering

North Dakota Supreme CourtNorth Dakota motorists could receive millions in refunds from illegally imposed traffic fines following a ruling Monday from the North Dakota Supreme Court. The justices were unanimous in denying that municipalities had the legal authority to set traffic ticket fines at a level exceeding that set down in state law. Several cities including Dickinson and Fargo had filled local coffers by inflating the amount of revenue generated from traffic tickets claiming "home rule" authority. In some cases, minor fines that should have been $10 were inflated to $122 while a $55 state speeding fine became a $282 local fine.

That did not sit well with Stephanie Sauby who filed a federal class action lawsuit against the city of Fargo. As part of Sauby's challenge, the United States District Court, Southeastern Division for the District of North Dakota sought clarification from the state supreme court whether state law gave Fargo the ability to impose unlimited fines under a home rule city ordinance.

Between February 2003 and January 2006, Fargo police officers had accused Sauby of four different minor offenses ranging from choosing not to wear a seatbelt to allegedly speeding 9 MPH over the limit. The city demanded that Sauby pay $202 in fines, even though state law only allowed the collection of $72 for the same offenses. The high court found this unacceptable.

"A home rule city's power to enact ordinances that supersede state law is not without limitation, because a home rule city's powers must be based upon statutory provisions," Justice Dale V. Sandstrom wrote for the high court. "A penalty that exceeds the limits delineated by equivalent state law supersedes state law."

In its ruling the court set aside a 1982 Attorney General ruling that had given the green light to cities eager to boost traffic fines.

"The Attorney General's opinions on the issue are not persuasive, and we decline to follow them," Sandstrom wrote.

Sauby's federal suit will now proceed with the judge in the case deciding how many should receive refunds for the illegally imposed fines. A full copy of the decision is available in a 30k PDF file at the source link below. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What To Do If You Lose Your Copy Of A Traffic Ticket NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-08-15 13:34
South Dakota Supreme Court: City Not Liable for Dangerous Street NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-07-22 07:29
Iowa Supreme Court to Rule on Photo Ticket Legality NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-05-23 13:26
Trial By Declaration: Fight A Traffic Ticket Without Going To Court NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-05-17 19:37
Supreme Court Expands Traffic Search Authority of Police NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-04-25 02:56

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42.

©2019 SpeedTrapHunter