Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2010-11-11
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation California, Louisiana Supreme Courts Thumb Down Traffic Cameras

Article: California, Louisiana Supreme Courts Thumb Down Traffic Cameras

Louisiana Supreme CourtThe highest courts in California and Louisiana yesterday denied the requests of municipal officials desperate to save their photo enforcement programs. In New Orleans, the red light camera and speed camera program must shut down after the Louisiana Supreme Court unanimously rejected the city's request to overturn the decision of Orleans Parish Civil District Court Judge Paulette R. Irons who found earlier this month that the program violated the city's own charter.

"We are obviously disappointed in supreme court's decision because these cameras have proven to be an important deterrent to unlawful traffic practices," a city statement explained.

As a matter of law, the high court found no reason to overturn the Irons decision, just as the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals had done less than two weeks ago. As victorious Attorney Edward R. Washington III considers launching a class action suit to force refunds, the city is digging in its heels, refusing to pay back citations paid under the illegal program.

"It is our position that camera violations issued through yesterday will still be valid," the city insisted. "You must continue to pay all tickets issued until this point."

The California Supreme Court likewise rejected a request by the cities of Santa Ana and West Hollywood to depublish an appellate decision that found cities had to provide warning notices for thirty days at each and every red light camera intersection before issuing actual tickets (view ruling). Almost no cities do so, raising the possibility of a class action challenge to refund tickets illegally issued.

The high court rejected municipal arguments and declared the case closed, leaving it to stand with precedential value in Orange County and persuasive value throughout the state. The decision comes as justices prepare to rule on a larger case that turns on the question of whether contracts for red light camera services paid on a per-ticket basis are inherently void. That case had been pending the resolution of a case, County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield, which the court decided in July. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Louisiana Supreme Court Stays Traffic Camera Ruling NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2010-10-20 11:57
Everybody Loves (To Destroy) Ticket Cameras NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2010-01-05 17:50
UK, California and New York Destroy Traffic Cameras NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-07-26 22:34
Louisiana: Public Slams Traffic Cameras in Referendum NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-04-05 23:34
California Supreme Court to Review Red Light Cameras NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-09-28 11:30


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter