Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:

Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2009-11-29
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Photo Radar Companies Squabble in Court

Article: Photo Radar Companies Squabble in Court

Unlicensed radar unitA federal judge in August refused to dismiss a lawsuit filed by American Traffic Solutions (ATS) against its Australian rival, Redflex Traffic Systems. The two photo enforcement companies have been locked in a battle over the statewide speed camera contract that the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) awarded to Redflex last year.

ATS argued that Redflex only won the contract by lying in bid proposals, particularly regarding the use of radar units not certified by the Federal Communications Commission or International Association of Chiefs of Police. ATS argued that this amounted to false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act. US District Court Judge Frederick J. Marton ruled that the charge appeared to have enough merit to proceed.

"Defendants argue that the 2007 and 2008 bid proposals cannot serve as the basis for a false advertising claim because they did not contain any false representations," Marton wrote in his ruling. "We disagree. Defendants' bid proposals included several representations that Redflex would provide 'IACP approved speed enforcement solutions,' and use 'full IACP certified speed measurement devices.' A dispute remains as to whether these representations were false and meet the other requirements of a Lanham Act violation."

Redflex also attempted to dismiss the lawsuit by saying DPS did not care which specific radar units were used in the program because the agency was outsourcing every aspect of ticketing to Redflex. The court did not buy that argument and allowed the suit to proceed.

"Although DPS did not purchase photo enforcement units, DPS may have had an interest in ensuring that the devices used for its program complied with relevant laws and regulations," Marton wrote. "We cannot, therefore, resolve this issue on the pleadings alone."

A copy of the judge's August order is available from the source link below. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DPS Corrupted from Photo Radar Cash? NMA Reporter News 0 2009-10-09 14:49
3,600 Photo Radar Tickets Set for Court NMA Reporter News 0 2009-07-25 20:26
Arizona: History Underscores Unpopularity of Photo Radar NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-30 14:50
Iowa Supreme Court Saves Photo Ticketing Program NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-08-29 21:42
Trial By Declaration: Fight A Traffic Ticket Without Going To Court NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2008-05-17 19:37

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31.

©2019 SpeedTrapHunter