Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:

Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2009-09-14
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Ohio, Arizona Special Interests Battle Anti-Camera Initiatives

Article: Ohio, Arizona Special Interests Battle Anti-Camera Initiatives

Red Means Stop billboardSpecial interest groups continue to battle a pair of anti-photo enforcement ballot initiatives in Ohio and one in Arizona. In Chillicothe, Ohio, officials are so desperate to prevent the public from deciding whether or not to keep the cameras that the city's legal department moved to block a citizen-led ballot petition before the Ross County Board of Elections. Last week, the board rejected the city's demand outright.

Representatives from Citizens Against Photo Enforcement (CAPE), which collected the signatures, were thrilled at the outcome. Voters will now decide for themselves whether or not to kick out Redflex Traffic Systems, the Australian company that runs the cameras.

"We believe that this protest was a Redflex move," Rebekah Valentich told TheNewspaper. "The assistant law director did not even know how many cameras we had... Just the comments he used during his back to the people speech seemed very rehearsed and reeked of Redflex."

In Toledo, Redflex and city officials were successful in thwarting the desire of 8500 city residents who signed a petition seeking a referendum on cameras. The initiative's sponsors, the We Demand a Vote coalition, did not realize that Toledo's city code included a special requirement that each page of a petition have the circulator's signature notarized. That was enough for the city to block the referendum. The coalition insists that it will be back next year.

"Our legal team feels horrible they missed this extraneous and unnecessary step that most cities in Ohio do not require," We Demand a Vote said in a statement. "This has only served to strengthen our resolve, and we hope next year when we issue a clarion call for patriots to retake civil liberty, you will respond."

In Arizona, the entities that profit from photo ticketing are turning to a self-branded "grassroots" victim advocacy organization to promote photo enforcement. Ten years ago, the Red Means Stop Coalition appeared as the city of Chandler began to prepare for the installation of red light cameras. Earlier this year, the group rebranded itself as the Red Means Stop Traffic Safety Alliance as a statewide petition drive to give voters a chance to outlaw all forms of automated ticketing machine gathered steam.

"The program on our state highways does have its flaws, but should not been ended only amended," the group's executive director, Frank Hinds, wrote on the Red Means Stop Facebook page.

A total of 94 members have joined as "fans" of the ticketing effort on the popular social networking website. Using groups headed by victims is a favorite tactic of the National Campaign to Stop Red Light Running, a public relations front created by Australia's Redflex Traffic Systems, Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) and other photo ticketing companies. The campaign's website specifically recruits victims to be used as lobbying tools for the industry.

Once formed, the groups are funded by other entities that receive money directly and indirectly from automated ticketing programs. For example, the Red Means Stop group receives support from:
  • Arizona traffic schools, which receive money from photo ticket recipients seeking to escape license points
  • The Governor's Office of Highway Safety, which is a state organization funded by traffic tickets
  • Redflex (via the National Campaign to Stop Red Light Running front group)
  • The Arizona Department of Transportation, another state organization which receives some funding from tickets
  • AAA of Arizona, which sells insurance and collects additional premium revenue from photo ticket recipients (statewide tickets excepted)
  • State Farm Insurance, which also collects revenue from ticket points
Representatives from the group CameraFraud.com, which has received no funding from any corporate interest, vowed to fight back against the well-funded front groups with a true grassroots effort. CameraFraud has 1611 members in Arizona. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Majority Of Speed Camera Photos In Arizona Are Unusable NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2009-05-20 10:09
Red Light Camera and Speed Camera CrimeLine NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-01-07 22:11
Arizona Speed Camera Contract Can be Canceled NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-12-24 04:34
Arizona: Red Light Camera Tickets a Speed Camera NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-11-26 11:32
Speed Camera Vendors Engage in All-Out Battle NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 1 2008-08-20 14:37

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40.

©2019 SpeedTrapHunter