Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > Speed Trap & Traffic Enforcement > Economics & Politics
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:


Economics & Politics Discussion of the economic and political market driving factors of automated enforcement technology.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2009-05-14
NMA Reporter NMA Reporter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Feb
Posts: 125
NMA Reporter is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Tennessee Appeals Court Reiterates Its Support for Red Light Cameras

Article: Tennessee Appeals Court Reiterates Its Support for Red Light Cameras

Tennessee Court of AppealsThe Tennessee Court of Appeals reiterated yesterday that constitutional protections do not apply to anyone mailed a red light camera citation. In a three-page decision, a three-judge panel unanimously rejected the challenge mounted by Joshua D. Kimsey, the recipient of a $50 ticket from the Australian company, Redflex Traffic Systems. Redflex accused Kimsey of a violation that took place in Knoxville, but Kimsey refused to pay the fine and instead filed motions to have the case transferred to a criminal court. A municipal court denied the motions. A circuit judge declared the photo ticket a valid "quasi-civil matter." The appeals court agreed, summarily dismissing the idea that all constitutional guarantees should apply to photo tickets.

"The (state) supreme court and this court have previously held that actions based on a violation of a city ordinance are civil in nature for the purposes of appeal/procedure," Judge Herschel Pickens Franks wrote for the court. "Thus, the trial court properly denied defendant's motion seeking to have the Rules of Criminal Procedure apply to this action."

The appeals panel referred to last year's Brown decision (view opinion) in which the judges ruled that the legislature had effectively given retroactive authority to municipalities to issue civil fines that sidestep the sort of criminal code provisions that would have made prosecutions more expensive. After a fine is declared a civil matter, the municipality can presume the guilt of vehicle owners for red light and speed offenses and deny attempts to move a case to a venue where the burden of proof is 'beyond a reasonable doubt.'

"Defendant also argues the trial court should have transferred this action to the criminal division, but as explained, these actions are considered civil in nature, and defendant's precise issues regarding due process were addressed by this court in Brown," Franks wrote. "The record does not show that defendant's constitutional rights were infringed, and the issues raised are without merit."

The court finally decided that Redflex does not exercise a police power in taking photographs, mailing citations and collecting fines. The court reviewed Knoxville's contract and asserted that because a Knoxville police officer has the capability of clicking a button to "review" all of the citations generated by Redflex that the city has "plenary power" to decide who to cite. The court having exhausted Kimsey's arguments ordered him to pay the costs of the appeal.

A copy of the decision is available in a 270k PDF file at the source link below. Source
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)   IP: 192.168.2.1
Old 2009-05-14
Speed Trap Hunter's Avatar
Speed Trap Hunter Speed Trap Hunter is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2007 Jun
Posts: 32
Speed Trap Hunter has disabled reputation
Default Supreme Court Justice Janet Napolitano

This is why the end-game will likely be played out at the Supreme Court level and why the battle lines must be drawn now, before that day comes.

It's simply a matter of time as there is simply too much money involved.

Unfortunately the love-of-money (which is at the root of all Evil) of certain ruthless individuals and companies, focused only on their bottom line, will do anything-and-everything (win-at-all-costs, through any-method, and by proxy) to achieve their nefarious goals.

It is for this reason alone that I strongly oppose the nomination of Supreme Court Justice Janet Napolitano to reside over the highest law of our land.

Not withstanding her alternative social views, Napolitano has already demonstrated the capacity to undermine the rule-of-law in the state of Arizona and I suspect would carry that disregard for our sacred Constitutional protections to our nation's highest bench.

STH
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speed Cameras: ACLU of Iowa Challenges use of Speed/Red Light Cameras Veil Guy Speed on Green - Photo Enforcement 3 2008-12-03 08:55
California Supreme Court to Review Red Light Cameras NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-09-28 11:30
Tennessee Appeals Court Embraces Red Light Cameras NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-08-04 18:30
California Appeals Court Defends Red Light Cameras NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2008-06-16 10:22
ACLU on Photo Enforcement, Red Light Cameras, Speed Cameras, Surveillance Cameras Veil Guy Speed on Green - Photo Enforcement 0 2008-02-01 23:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:35.


©2019 SpeedTrapHunter