Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum  

Go Back   Speed Trap Hunter Forum: Best Radar Detectors, Laser Jammers, Laser Detectors, Speed Cameras Forum > National Motorists Association (NMA) Discussion Group & Forum > Driving Freedoms (NMA Foundation)
Radar Detectors Forum Logon:

Driving Freedoms (NMA Foundation) The NMA Foundation is non-profit group dedicated to finding innovative ways to improve and protect the interests of North American motorists.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   IP:
Old 2007-09-12
Veil Guy's Avatar
Veil Guy Veil Guy is offline
Speed Trap Hunter
Join Date: 2007 Jul
Posts: 116
Veil Guy is on a distinguished road
Default Ticket Cameras In Lubbock: A Texas-Sized Mess

Ticket Cameras In Lubbock: A Texas-Sized Mess

The road to photo enforcement in Lubbock, Texas has been a bumpy one. It all started in late 2006 when city officials put together a plan to have a ticket camera program operational sometime with in the next year.

While the list of things to do included drafting an ordinance and setting up fines, it did not include exploring engineering solutions which is recommended by the Federal Highway Administration before implementing a camera program. In fact, the city’s traffic engineering department specifically stated that they would not look into engineering improvements.

It was clear from the beginning that money was the motivating factor in the installation of ticket cameras in Lubbock. The city report even highlighted the fact that it hoped to gain over two million dollars in profit from the program for the first year.

Yellow Light Times Shortened

After signing a contract with American Traffic System (ATS), the city thought they were ready to start collecting revenue from citizens, but their greed forced a delay.

The length of time that a light remains yellow is a key factor in the number of red-light violations that will occur at an intersection. Studies have shown that increased the yellow light time by as little as 1.5 seconds, can reduce violations by over 90 percent. This didn’t seem to matter to the city of Lubbock unfortunately.

A local television station, KCBD, did some research and discovered that the city had shortened the yellow light duration at eight of the twelve intersections where cameras were to be installed in hopes of increasing the number of ticket camera violations

Federal regulations require the yellow light time to be no less than 3.0 seconds, but at one intersection the yellow light duration was clocked at 2.9 seconds, which meant that it was an illegal configuration.

A city traffic engineer admitted that the yellow light times should have been longer and due the bad press that came rolling in as a result, the city council voted to delay the installation of the cameras.

Hiring Freeze

The delay in the ticket camera installation had a predictable effect on the city’s budget. The city determined that correctly-timed traffic lights would not generate the expected amount of revenue.

So, one week after the camera delay was announced, the city implemented a freeze on all new hiring for government departments.

Safety Is Not Profitable

Despite the timing issues, the city decided to go ahead with the cameras. The city initially planned to install cameras at the fourteen locations with highest number of accidents.

However, in a report given to the city by ATS, the camera manufacturer, it was determined that the “most dangerous” intersections in Lubbock would not be profitable enough to sustain a ticket camera program.
Instead of scrapping the program, the city asked the company to look at safer intersections to see if it could find intersections that would be more profitable.

An Unhappy Ending

On June 1st, 2007 the city turned on the red-light cameras and began issuing warnings to drivers who triggered a violation. Two weeks later, the cameras began issuing real citations.

Shortly after the program went into effect, Texas Governor Rick Perry signed several bills into law that restricted the use of red-light cameras in the state. One such restriction stated that cities would be required to send half the revenue collected from the ticket cameras to the state.

Faced with these new restrictions, the city council decided to have a vote in late June to decide whether or not to continue with the ticket camera program.

The city council voted 5-2 to keep the cameras, but Lubbock’s history suggests the story probably isn’t over yet.

By Aaron Quinn, Communications Director, NMA

©2007 NMA Foundation, All rights reserved.

Veil Guy's Sig:

Protect yourself from speeding tickets[/b] with the VEIL stealth coating.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Texas Cities Defy House Attempt to Ban Red Light Cameras NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 1 2009-05-22 10:44
Mississippi House Votes to Ban Ticket Cameras; Missouri and Maryland Protest NMA Reporter Economics & Politics 0 2009-02-16 13:19
Bernie Madoff & Red-Light Cameras NMA Reporter NMA Articles 0 2009-02-14 14:07
Speed Cameras: ACLU of Iowa Challenges use of Speed/Red Light Cameras Veil Guy Speed on Green - Photo Enforcement 3 2008-12-03 08:55
Florida: Stop Ticket Cameras Veil Guy NMA Alerts 0 2007-10-27 10:12

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23.

©2019 SpeedTrapHunter