Thread: Jammer advice
View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)   IP: 129.22.226.41
Old 2008-10-28
TSi+WRX TSi+WRX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: 2008 Sep
Location: Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
Posts: 44
TSi+WRX is on a distinguished road
Default

On the note of durability/reliability -

I do not think that it is fair, at all, to say that any of the laser-diode (CLED) based jammers are far-inferior to their LED-based counterparts (specifically, the Blinder and Escort products), in terms of overall durability/reliability, particularly given the current "state-of-existence" of the comparable LED products.

Although both Blinder and Escort have racked up what can only be said to be the most impressive miles-on-road and years-on-road data, when it comes to overall durability/reliability, neither are perfect, and evidence of this exists aplenty on the "older" community discussion Forums, such as RD.net, and also are logged in the memories of those who have been in this hobby for some time.

The Escort ZR3, for example, saw its first failures nearly a year after the product was initially introduced - and it was through this hard-won experience that Escort's reliability/durability parameters were revamped.

Yet, still, on RD.net, after the initial introduction of the current ZR4, it only took weeks - and in some cases, just days - for several members to have encountered weathersealing problems of not only the forward heads, but also even of the rear.

Obviously, although Escort's had much experience in this matter - but while their previous experience did help guide them, it could not insure that a revamped hardware design would not cause such issues, and it is clear from the experience of those early-adopters that this is well the case.

Even now, we need to remember that the new ZR4 has seen less time-on-road than even the replacement batch of LI heads, claimed as a part of their warranty services (to add to this example, one needs to be reminded that we did not see issues with the LI's initial-US-batch [ver. 8.0 heads] until well after MONTHS of use, in-comparison to the same rash of issues with the ZR4, after only weeks). Furthermore, that the ZR4, in comparison to the current-iteration LPP, now stands well beyond a year, in trailing availability of durability/reliability data.

In terms of the Blinder, much the same, again, can be said about its undeniably impressive durability/reliability record. It is likely the most widespread of the "enthusiast" level LED-based jammers (discounting the Escort and K40, both on the basis that they are oftentimes either marketed as a dealer-add-on at higher-end auto dealers, as well as sometimes "given away" in that same respect), and to the best of my knowledge, few, if any complaints, are ever lodged against the old 0-suffix (M40/30/20) units, in greater autodom, with only occasional claims submitted against them in the speed-detections countermeasures community.

Nevertheless, while such extraordinarily positive data exists for the older Blinder products, claims against the new 5-suffix units (M45/35/25) are not unknown. I was, myself, rather shocked to hear of such issues, but as you can well see from RR.net (ref: Radar Detector Reviews & Radar Detectors Review Forum & Test - View Single Post - CONSUMER ALERT!! Laser Star officially sucks balls ), this is not something that can be ignored, again, particularly of such a "new" unit.

Currently - speaking solely of jammers that are bought NEW, retail - the LPP has been on-road the longest, and truly maintains the best durability/reliability record.

The new ZR4 trails both the 5-suffix (M45/35/25) Blinders (and to this, I should add, that there's even less known of the J16s, due to their even younger age and the fact that the critical jamming LEDs have been updated) as well as the Laser Interceptor by a wide margin, when it comes to their time-on-road and miles-on-road.

Yes, past history should be examined, when we're talking about durability and reliability, but a more accurate of the PRESENT circumstances should also be dissected, in-detail.

----

That all-said.....

Please do not read my statements above, regarding durability/reliability, as some kind of "push" for you to go that way, vschuel.

I was only examining that particular issue (durability/reliability), in the above presentation.

Currently, I do *NOT* see the current-generation LPP as a viable jammer - particularly in your area and proposed areas of travel - due to the inability of this unit to protect against the LTI TruSpeed.

My recommendation would be either to go with the Blinder M25 (or M35), J16 - or, alternatively, the LI (dual), 7.06.

And honestly, given your vehicle, the ZR4 should do well, too. However, given its early weathersealing issues, I'd shy away from this product, at least for the moment-being, until at least it reaches its anniversary date.


TSi+WRX's Sig:- Allen/Usual Suspect "DumboRAT"/One of the Three Stooges

LI Rev.2.8, Ver.7.03 - quad 8.0A-f w/ 8.5 Slim-r
LPP v8.3h(CAN/AU)/10.1s, 2xF/1xR
9500i, Red (4307) w/ZR3
VEIL G4
CR8APL8s, w/LaserShield(F)
Cheetah GPS-Mirror

[ Wifey's FXT -> Bue 8500x50 (Rev.5); LI Rev.2.9, Ver.7.08 - dual 8.5 ]

Me: '05 Legacy 2.5GT Ltd., mildly modified
Wifey: '09 Forester XT, barely modded
Baby-Anna: too short to reach any pedals!
Reply With Quote